From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 24042@debbugs.gnu.org, Tassilo Horn <tsdh@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#24042: mudraw doesn't exist any more
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2020 15:16:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v9gtadh2.fsf@gnus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvtwfkvw8u.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 20 Jul 2016 17:24:17 -0400")
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> Apparently mudraw has been superseded by "mutool draw". I'm using the
> patch below to accommodate this new situation, but it's not
> quite satisfactory.
It seems like this was fixed in a somewhat different way in this commit:
commit d5f629d193ffe88c464379f02dd2adaadc9dfdf0
Author: Federico Tedin <federicotedin@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Sun Feb 3 13:48:31 2019 -0300
Commit: Tassilo Horn <tsdh@gnu.org>
CommitDate: Mon Feb 4 16:47:00 2019 +0100
But it's basically the same idea (and has the same problems as Stefan's
patch); it introduces this helper function:
(defun doc-view-pdfdraw-program-subcommand ()
"Return the mutool subcommand replacing mudraw.
Recent MuPDF distributions replaced `mudraw' with `mutool draw'."
(when (string-match "mutool[^/\\]*$" doc-view-pdfdraw-program)
'("draw")))
I think a better solution would have been to allow the command to be a
list, for instance, so you could have '("mutool" "draw") be the command.
But I guess nobody has complained, so I'm closing this bug report.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-04 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-20 21:24 bug#24042: mudraw doesn't exist any more Stefan Monnier
2016-07-20 22:53 ` Nicolas Petton
2016-07-21 1:17 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-07-21 1:33 ` Mark Oteiza
2016-07-21 1:55 ` Mark Oteiza
2016-07-21 3:46 ` Clément Pit--Claudel
2020-09-04 13:16 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v9gtadh2.fsf@gnus.org \
--to=larsi@gnus.org \
--cc=24042@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=tsdh@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).