From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44834: Fix for failing indentation of Tcl procs nested in namespace Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 19:15:20 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <87v9as2d5b.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <87sg8zk4lj.fsf@precedence.co.uk> <87k0rzatbp.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7mo85t6.fsf@gnus.org> <8735y7nk9z.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7mlk5re.fsf@gnus.org> <8335y5l059.fsf@gnu.org> <837dngj6yp.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9ayhdn1.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnvdvh1y.fsf@gnus.org> <96c6642f-8e2b-e77f-7b92-2fb57fd62d3d@yandex.ru> <520b0008-4e88-1509-bc78-607c7c5747cf@yandex.ru> <87sg5wxlm4.fsf@gnus.org> <835z2s9g5i.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20171"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: anticrisisg@gmail.com, Lars Ingebrigtsen , 44834@debbugs.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 16 18:36:53 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lC4HN-00058L-Cn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 18:36:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51860 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lC4HM-00019C-ED for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:36:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41284) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lC422-0005Me-KX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:21:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58144) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lC422-0006EF-Bj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lC422-0007Gj-9W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:21:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44834 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch fixed Original-Received: via spool by 44834-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44834.161349601827867 (code B ref 44834); Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44834) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2021 17:20:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41457 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lC41K-0007FP-1Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:20:18 -0500 Original-Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]:39493) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lC418-0007EM-HR for 44834@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:20:16 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 91.129.98.178 Original-Received: from mail.gandi.net (m91-129-98-178.cust.tele2.ee [91.129.98.178]) (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87B7EC000B; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:19:58 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <835z2s9g5i.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:38:33 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200144 Archived-At: >> So I think the text should go back to "15" unless Richard has a better >> explanation for the change. > > Would it be good enough to say "about 10" instead? The exact number > is impossible to define, and arguing about it is waste of time and > energy. When in doubt (and we rarely are), we can always ask (and > actually do ask). Or for a number between 10 and 15 - "a dozen".