From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51883: 29.0.50; Command to get accidentally deleted frames back Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 15:33:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87v90dekii.fsf@web.de> References: <87czn1gfb1.fsf@web.de> <838rxo0zk7.fsf@gnu.org> <83tugbyliv.fsf@gnu.org> <1adc044f473776dc3748@heytings.org> <83v90ouyp7.fsf@gnu.org> <664b6d0147a183b153f7@heytings.org> <87tufxg78p.fsf@web.de> <227d35a5bcbeda91dd8b@heytings.org> <83fsrhztvn.fsf@gnu.org> <87lf19g529.fsf@web.de> <838rx9zs9r.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7bxg2d8.fsf@web.de> <835ysdzq4s.fsf@gnu.org> <87czmlg1rz.fsf@web.de> <227d35a5bc25a5f57453@heytings.org> <87zgppekxe.fsf@web.de> <227d35a5bcdae0a85f4d@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8238"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 51883@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 27 15:34:25 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mqymW-0001yH-Be for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 15:34:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45470 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqymU-0007Rk-K5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:34:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59090) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqymD-0007Qy-H6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:34:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50033) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqymA-0007aN-Dr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:34:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqymA-0005jG-AY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:34:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51883 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 51883-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51883.163802359921968 (code B ref 51883); Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51883) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2021 14:33:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33346 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqylS-0005iG-Ue for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:33:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:42011) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqylR-0005i2-6P for 51883@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 09:33:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1638023590; bh=coGJmfKLFevUydkjaP2N16B96uhw1quLet8TwPA3kL0=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=FfVur8stOrLdtB3yEJ8rrsQRW/CT41fAJdXku1qhLnSxe8gNozldFnbrUIYOooZWl 6yGvQemJYNqvBkKqPKmfE0uzdKsBG5rEuKlkXwmkTNt4jXxTyoEFgqrOx0vYzmByBZ zR/NeSLG3rs9Ae/iGrR8MMQKFpJHd9nKVDFeLr90= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([92.208.225.87]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb006 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M1JF8-1msdiu2NiM-003BIz; Sat, 27 Nov 2021 15:33:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: <227d35a5bcdae0a85f4d@heytings.org> (Gregory Heytings's message of "Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:26:41 +0000") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:LfgiPfGC5zgQdyg5+GeGBN06iq7rwIPXZKXsfEXXnp62Gbs3tHu MZx7jaXDEvGtSROLCAgIvPMzsGfkfbbRxzaqmxJVzqUGbwlIlC4hXiplHWr4AKa2TgeJrWW QmyHWCHLw2VNvPeXRRF6n8eTo7WXla5JVqQ0Day1fwyQ1qJFpvuK1sKt+GFS8lvDPRvWphV 4BXK0QQl0VbYKC194rpNQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:wGKT+KKM9Q8=:eTrwxxfMj7v6Jo4WNdnHvP 5k5dhqo7aNKBV4fX+7J/X0NK+ZBuTd0Ujv9A3dqF7IS6FKho1NUX1qdfkCjMMfVX2GCoArw4b ly1cbJCaW6DvwOQrLl179jR9cE07vmpub16dDo28JI7it1QfsMzsSNA/rWnhLPQlBlDAs673w XyaWMtQrhT/KUUP+TXMaFVSdaGbNx970qnpwzJ2ELXCtBuDCC1tTQvtfRrUb0ELR1AyJoyDlx 8VOQA54CYfOmpqj0GXU1MxpZKXbflQCy4qTzSzc2gs4TplB1cp1FCPPJKTgEJg/qhaFOnjQP3 Bi1PAzNHSvmB67q61LzdqWCRArfJHGRHPTbM0NKH2w+KhoUTyE5Jz1K9b2vtM9I1vxhMTkKs8 P6e7OlQRUa3vkfZL6sd91QFLeMmUKxStqlxQHzzLhkBXFL/BsWQ1pEkDQjm2xjriScR9d6q8u WX50064vqZPgB/s5nAOe6QQ75qxLhhwok1mUvsHNPIBa9Iwd8/1K0uj7EBBrjgAM9LG2L+xyI cKnjEQUKdBDfBlzQBJUfnl3sY4omSkc1AiGimJHrnvqLtGCywhMt8kO03sf+dnJ+I/n0eUK4J S4SwyRo9jdvwnj2y3Saf3PqkP2f68vNHUDeh1EDSKVrO0q0cpPLiEsUuavc0cJS2WiJxctaV5 hzD9srd9DYUujj9ZSGtFSwMMJTgkSNVnkKMcPQfWy25/3X/OFTwMiHsRDs6IBSP4c0BwwTeyY ZXQbV2VTOIHnCUmA6IvaVne88xDzctbx8l4QYF2upaFnmeQmmPassUxgr4f+akXVr0y5Svf+ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:220933 Archived-At: Gregory Heytings writes: > An error, something like "You didn't specify a frame number." What's different in this case, compared to commands that do use (interactive "p")? Why is raising an error here better than doing what at least some people expect? Michael.