unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>
Cc: 29003@debbugs.gnu.org, Radon Rosborough <radon.neon@gmail.com>,
	"Charles A. Roelli" <charles@aurox.ch>
Subject: bug#29003: [python.el] Docstring from PEP 257 is filled incorrectly by Emacs
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 15:56:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v909d744.fsf_-_@gnus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tv7bqgii.fsf@marxist.se> (Stefan Kangas's message of "Mon, 11 Nov 2019 03:43:49 +0100")

Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se> writes:

    > > > def complex(real=0.0, imag=0.0):
    > > >     """Form a complex number.
    > > > 
    > > >     Keyword arguments:
    > > >     real -- the real part (default 0.0)
    > > >     imag -- the imaginary part (default 0.0)
    > > >     """
    > > >     if imag == 0.0 and real == 0.0:
    > > >         return complex_zero
    > > >     ...

[...]

>> is not modified when filled. The question is whether the example given
>> by PEP 257 should be considered "standard" syntax for introducing
>> keyword arguments, and whether such syntax should be supported by
>> Emacs in a similar way to how `python-docstring' supports reST syntax.
>
> I think this should ideally be supported by Emacs, but it should be
> configurable and disabled by default.

I think introducing these kinds of semantics in doc strings is
inherently brittle (unless really well-defined).  For instance,

      If this is a doc string, and then I
      pause -- using a double dash for a
      pause is common -- then we'd be filling
      things differently.

So I don't think changing the pep-257 style would be appropriate, and I
think adding a user option for this wouldn't receive much use.  So I'm
closing this bug report.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no





      reply	other threads:[~2021-11-30 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-26  2:08 bug#29003: 25.3; Docstring from PEP 257 is filled incorrectly by Emacs Radon Rosborough
2017-10-26 19:03 ` Charles A. Roelli
2017-10-26 19:23   ` Radon Rosborough
2017-10-26 19:41     ` Charles A. Roelli
2019-11-11  2:43     ` Stefan Kangas
2021-11-30 14:56       ` Lars Ingebrigtsen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87v909d744.fsf_-_@gnus.org \
    --to=larsi@gnus.org \
    --cc=29003@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=charles@aurox.ch \
    --cc=radon.neon@gmail.com \
    --cc=stefan@marxist.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).