From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#52205: Allow configuring multiple mail accounts for smtpmail.el Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:41:19 +0100 Message-ID: <87v8zrpam8.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87fsrdmnqx.fsf@posteo.net> <87lf15arwk.fsf@gnus.org> <87bl20bswc.fsf@posteo.net> <87k0gogmgn.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmqg13qp.fsf@posteo.net> <87bl20f4zn.fsf@gnus.org> <87fsratxmq.fsf@posteo.net> <87wnklwtlw.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfv8u41f.fsf@posteo.net> <87ee6s6vow.fsf@gnus.org> <87ee6g71m1.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6054"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 52205@debbugs.gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 14 14:46:57 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mx88v-0001Gq-Ar for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:46:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56376 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mx88t-0004BD-IE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:46:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55344) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mx84A-0006xW-Ov for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:42:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46304) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mx84A-0005b0-D4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:42:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mx84A-0002iz-6s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:42:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 13:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52205 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 52205-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52205.163948929310438 (code B ref 52205); Tue, 14 Dec 2021 13:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 52205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2021 13:41:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57850 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mx83g-0002iI-Qg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:41:33 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:40946) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mx83e-0002i3-Tx for 52205@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 08:41:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=L7rcz58G+IR8bPN6HoNKGfui/BvbNw2IGpzZLXmDIKM=; b=Fj30Mqy332eHwsWQcpzJny3OeV TPh+xG9SWjw4ziSzfIszPlUhhkzrAu58VQkrB1a/bGFWmA2bvpfyhFGu5RXwSKg2j9z1FTrOMBeZM LoDkegkx+VVhowOqV0tdZTcxRW503tyCd/7D2gLgEOnSwROGW3tOyBeMFTGz6g9DmljI=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mx83W-0000yd-Al; Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:41:24 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEXp5OKzpqKKeHVS PTv///9X6rKaAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+UMDg0OMB/wNNIAAAGSSURBVDjLbZMLtsMg CETRbgBxA4obaHT/e3sDfpK2j9M0jdeBwRIKhEiNI9OJqBTJnwNAuUHoADP+UZDnyh8gKGUqW1G+ FMl3tvJRY6Zi/gV8in+DsH7m8lVjg1hiXbs5WY0bhLqyjMofYKUKqfWCzn8AtTau/xQkBsZxFesG quMNgM7hg5I8wRWbAQ+AGlaqBlDQudQFcIMpzjiPUQRZUtIKoC5lsh1SAXBXRLxCQrUA0EZNwTLJ AlXQc0hpDBgj3y72SSpFVNjAFUhPgFbp6qAracfjXAbIVdMGQ+b+jgvZsM2AzAY5ApinLuJgnLPS 1n3SNNdsQE2BC+m6tX5AWwqYtWGJAJeDtP5o1LT5enVpVzup7shdxgTVgWUh+3r1tEAhq30GyhQz +LFqrq8b8BqzBdpcv4j4U6ELuCLcoLbu4E3TLq3X5AA2EA1M1auOCeirxgY2u/xk+QBbfXQC0JZb 4mcy1d0epsT9LMdNp8KWps8FJG/F7ANgn8nYbu10Yc1f9gO6vxrknoN747COMPEfhaRNUtUweIMA AAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRlADIwMjEtMTItMTRUMTM6MTQ6NDcrMDA6MDDwvXo3AAAAJXRFWHRk YXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIxLTEyLTE0VDEzOjE0OjQ3KzAwOjAwgeDCiwAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: David Sylvian's _Brilliant Trees_: "Backwaters" In-Reply-To: <87ee6g71m1.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Mon, 13 Dec 2021 19:20:54 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:222370 Archived-At: Philip Kaludercic writes: >> Or we could add a command like `message-update-smtp-method-header' and >> people could call that (or add it to their hooks) after altering their >> From (or whatever) headers. > > So if the mechanism is supposed to be kept general (instead of just > checking the From header), how would this differ from the already > existing message-send-mail-hook? How a command would differ from a hook? I'm not sure I understand the question. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no