From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 10:59:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87v8y0cjkn.fsf@gmail.com> References: <877dap3uea.fsf@gnus.org> <4CEFB383-E7C8-4AA8-9B43-6267E5523DC3@acm.org> <87lez2tzfz.fsf@gnus.org> <87lez2tzfz.fsf@gnus.org> <87a6fihaku.fsf@gmail.com> <469D64F5020000015C413831@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> <0106AEA10200006A824A10E1@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> <61F1561A020000A1000472CB@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> <87v8y5mblo.fsf@gnus.org> <867dal9k8g.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83ee4sc4f0.fsf@gnu.org> <87o83ud30u.fsf@gnus.org> <83leyybnee.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6fdcjiy.fsf@gnus.org> <83mtjd9nnk.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40846"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rms@gnu.org, mattiase@acm.org, Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de, juri@linkov.net, 24902@debbugs.gnu.org, Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 31 11:01:56 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nETVU-000APW-H6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 11:01:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38472 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nETVT-0001cP-0c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 05:01:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45624) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nETTf-0001cF-2D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 05:00:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45446) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nETTe-00030I-OQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 05:00:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nETTe-0003Sn-KO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 05:00:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 10:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24902 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 24902-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24902.164362315413215 (code B ref 24902); Mon, 31 Jan 2022 10:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24902) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2022 09:59:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38349 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nETSs-0003R5-HT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 04:59:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f49.google.com ([209.85.221.49]:43649) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nETSq-0003Qp-KV for 24902@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 04:59:13 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f49.google.com with SMTP id v13so24199372wrv.10 for <24902@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 01:59:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kCdPXKmvluM7qZ8eE4AB1WrIn0gDoKZ35L18Bv2uPgk=; b=ACyleLC+b2njSvD6NHAUGapcysMNYnTR5pt36RSJtNsW0vkrPx2tb/T0+fvWrlnUDO 54fqRssmIv9k0CU3mx/7N/9DVUx775kZvnyoy5pxRRPFdy7/GbC9IZVAIj6ctWrkL/Bk 8QML0Drke1ecAmMRcmJN1LomhjfWbf9jhFbcuBaW8Zb5ttowWyg5ge9zs01gYorRVOWl CZweR8eyzBjWwdCSyUDrcxxxTGddf7WVdrwwtQvRNx4fMEs/FA2BDkQ3/UO05anhQjxt ajrTuBqTqE5XSCBCQLQOYRdZ6jfnkAJvHJ+rnAMsjF3iQkw2/G1Nat8/9mTSpym64dKN E6oQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kCdPXKmvluM7qZ8eE4AB1WrIn0gDoKZ35L18Bv2uPgk=; b=GyTUG4lBaO8l0cISTxC1Ki6IPR9apFpxZA+ocKwLt9+TeFQHCI1VZyTUzNfTmCVIQL M4UbwWQJWLlVRrl1FtOeq4j/K7wxvpCAD89M/zHa1z3YKNqwnenegi7lJVaHHD4XZaJE xGA5mNcU7MQt5TU4toa0QmYnKJndAKCAeS9I/dd7bCxfkr7+gQxhzHll4K05/0rin9rY NiPS9Drl6BV5GW/YRbmOQccqT0XBMr0xMQ1ob8Suy6/4MWob4wHaaK4q8ZawXYLk2YD6 4SM5RlaYMlfeZ+gLFj/mZMVIP50cnWj5XVg6bPwg0i/h6Xen2ZMGv3BshqWA4wfGCOYj g76w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5316+m5um71ic6LOdHRQR1/i8KXEOlL3UlHljlh/dlnU7Xz4wnSe 3KSIPSyEmMLCycpdVv0qCvxH3twbhPo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy9IRLDDyzP0KAHfRNS5N8FyZDeKADNe20VDyEXAB13oDRbeg79HTHuM0UqkjCfIlDZHSulJg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4583:: with SMTP id p3mr8141118wrq.33.1643623146315; Mon, 31 Jan 2022 01:59:06 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from rltb ([2a01:e0a:3f3:fb50:ae3c:4d3:d015:f4f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l10sm11448364wrz.20.2022.01.31.01.59.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 31 Jan 2022 01:59:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83mtjd9nnk.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 30 Jan 2022 18:46:55 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:225658 Archived-At: >>>>> On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 18:46:55 +0200, Eli Zaretskii said: >> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen >> Thanks; I see. This sounds very useful especially when debugging the >> Emacs display, but perhaps isn't what most users would feel is vital? >> (But I don't know one way or the other.) Eli> Those are my frequent use cases. And mine. >> If we split this up into two commands, but added a user option to get >> the combined display back on `C-x =3D', would that be acceptable for= you? >> (I'm not saying that I actually want that, but just exploring what o= ur >> options are here; I don't have any strong feelings on the matter.) Eli> Why not put the 2 new commands on 2 other keys, and leave "C-x =3D" Eli> alone? +1 on this. It=CA=BCs not like the current 'C-x =3D' output is some horrendous UI mistake that needs fixing. Robert --=20