From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lin Jian via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56906: 28.1; attachment names containing Chinese characters are handled wrong by default Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 15:35:46 +0800 Message-ID: <87v8r88nke.fsf@linj.tech> References: <871qtydnqi.fsf@linj.tech> <87pmhgse25.fsf@gnus.org> <874jysa3dq.fsf@linj.tech> <87k07ojwqi.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: Lin Jian Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6599"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 56906@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 04 11:21:53 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oJX3B-0001YQ-Ic for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 11:21:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33276 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oJX3A-0004Pd-Kt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 05:21:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32950) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oJWyU-0002Sd-OP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 05:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33243) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oJWyU-0003xr-DQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 05:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oJWyU-0004lU-9U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 05:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lin Jian Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 09:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56906 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 56906-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56906.165960457118240 (code B ref 56906); Thu, 04 Aug 2022 09:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56906) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2022 09:16:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51222 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oJWxf-0004k1-2w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 05:16:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.linj.tech ([135.181.90.34]:34130) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oJVSB-000478-OP for 56906@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 03:39:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linj.tech; s=mail; t=1659598774; bh=XCgXJVstflSHQnq3wUVHeLOdEMgHrVxmDw60w07OAYI=; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to; b=SP8JyBGZC9UFiPlQF8VVS8U3KkiZvGRD3yA6JRw3mQBjzzHvLBDGeI7/49yhhHl82 E+S/FlTSkK6lSHMRszRtO+p1H+ffZf/AtJdW/Zm7in9ADcsOEOf43rVAhIBFg6Jbpu XWfcrs7Ea12IXsC9FFkkf0dZXBTDwsQFz7kA6gl9nRt0vT0UjmSItOpSbq9YkABrmQ 2IZwfsGAYZOqMtTPwCfjXpOFMN2S4Fa82wM4kaF294oyM5do87FHRWFBQUYyzR62xe J6/5McS262GljyPA9o2eU4ce8IHh0KaNdVez88Y2qZGagRAR5fTb3fQGJ5reMVEz5+ RTRY3He71Vc1Q== In-reply-to: <87k07ojwqi.fsf@gnus.org> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 05:16:08 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:238709 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Ah, I didn't follow the recipe closely enough. I see the problem, too, > if I have nothing in the message except the attachment. Good to hear that. I can confirm that the filename is handled well if the message is not empty. I have to admit that I did not notice it before.