From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#64735: 29.0.92; find invocations are ~15x slower because of ignores Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2023 11:43:22 +0000 Message-ID: <87v8ean99h.fsf@localhost> References: <87pm4lb4fr.fsf@gmx.de> <83pm4l9n0o.fsf@gnu.org> <87jzutb14l.fsf@gmx.de> <83mszp9kl2.fsf@gnu.org> <83h6pwa52z.fsf@gnu.org> <87ilaci637.fsf@catern.com> <83sf9g88eh.fsf@gnu.org> <87pm4krq2m.fsf@localhost> <838rb881ak.fsf@gnu.org> <87mszornlq.fsf@localhost> <83351g7yn5.fsf@gnu.org> <875y6brrnk.fsf@localhost> <83fs5f6opg.fsf@gnu.org> <87351frqr7.fsf@localhost> <831qgzuh5n.fsf@gnu.org> <87tttvq8df.fsf@localhost> <83y1j7t19d.fsf@gnu.org> <87r0ozq7ze.fsf@localhost> <83v8ebszcy.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1607"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: sbaugh@janestreet.com, rms@gnu.org, sbaugh@catern.com, dmitry@gutov.dev, michael.albinus@gmx.de, 64735@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 23 13:44:21 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qNXVd-0000GP-FB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 13:44:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qNXVL-00023H-TY; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 07:44:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qNXVK-000235-Bc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 07:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qNXVK-0001F9-3e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 07:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qNXVJ-00066A-S6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 07:44:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ihor Radchenko Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2023 11:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 64735 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 64735-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B64735.169011260023382 (code B ref 64735); Sun, 23 Jul 2023 11:44:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 64735) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jul 2023 11:43:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38844 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qNXUd-000654-NP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 07:43:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:58097) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qNXUa-00064n-Ll for 64735@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 07:43:18 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6007D240104 for <64735@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 13:43:10 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1690112590; bh=EprmvCXSJ/iOtbRGNLhnACUSKqCsfdR3S/u16gsSWyo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=r7ha4COXbDsaW5xacSz2vbExKt1206Xe0gARCR1Xpn6vT/KIWBvSr2xGhH5T4Ny0U ffUzVJE7A+OxtKxbYwW/pelPtvefI1mrjGRaThD3sE4OEWhE3pb3fOydg8ReJA+sE0 YGgF80fe4rLXHg4Fhwo669uxeayRXvdVFjhfkA6eqn49TRFHFZEKIGyWAO5dVErFVv Q2u8ewi/Rw2fIX/c78iZ+HeLklVhWz4Yy9JRqIbcCajsoCTzQ0PtRGj4S7jm1dqCcW ZfyNXiLUZM/vhk4T/G4SbWQ5E+u49tKCuU1oT6g7QeavJr/Xy4NSJ1yBotNgvaNKbu WBPWNVpr0lO7g== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4R81d90Vb1z9rym; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 13:43:08 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83v8ebszcy.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:265891 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> But what is the strategy that should be used to call the CALLBACK? >> You clearly had something other than "call as soon as we got another >> file name" in mind. > > It could be "call as soon as we got 100 file names", for example. The > number can even be a separate parameter passed to the API. Will consing the filename strings also be delayed until the callback is invoked? -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at