From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#74556: 30.0.92; Package upgrade can fail and results in deleted package Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2024 20:48:53 +0000 Message-ID: <87v7vvz0ay.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87plmgq55e.fsf@daniel-mendler.de> <87zflj62ai.fsf@posteo.net> <87v7w7617o.fsf@posteo.net> <86ttbfism4.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="361"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mail@daniel-mendler.de, 74556@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 07 21:50:21 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tK1kp-000AYb-Cg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 07 Dec 2024 21:50:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tK1ka-0002ac-Gj; Sat, 07 Dec 2024 15:50:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tK1kZ-0002Zy-8L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Dec 2024 15:50:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tK1kY-0007Vn-Vh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Dec 2024 15:50:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=jee8mc8Bn2dXgmAAzlu/sUFI/Dck5RkdN2gz0FmiK7w=; b=ivIcX+VgShrmQ26vZ6lW9k+zGjV2yMMPouG2TBWSj5K2tIrGXAEiJF31GVYi1jYqJ+scb57dGHBz9vymLa8EnKu1zlO6Yj2SsERB/4PclBecMM/Gdr+eMYOZWdd+syTmyFtKJWOkqGXbHk9VXQt769YbzqMNjHRQSjcH6cKirBsBb63f0v13j8jxNs5lXjyXiysqQdPUrCS86Tg1v8xbVwFtlI/C4VnWXbP6fN7PtOAR2Y5y7XIIGv03mNaMqh7oS3Bqy7wS/+V3jlEsIqbxaKyXZ3jxBAXJk/QkFEakJWw+a/1ayfCqOe1Yl95bq6Kdtl+Azk00J5XMoDcj68rDYg==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tK1kY-0002Oh-IE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Dec 2024 15:50:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Philip Kaludercic Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2024 20:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 74556 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 74556-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B74556.17336045449054 (code B ref 74556); Sat, 07 Dec 2024 20:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 74556) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2024 20:49:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48693 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tK1jc-0002Ly-72 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Dec 2024 15:49:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:34301) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tK1jZ-0002LK-Pm for 74556@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Dec 2024 15:49:03 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E931240101 for <74556@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 7 Dec 2024 21:48:54 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1733604535; bh=YGwkm9KY5AS4jawXLDtnDKDs7lxGGUA1V9nXrOAbfrQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:OpenPGP:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type:From; b=oz10Z+Qqd9NWWA2rn6UIFfrPyyLcuQg6rNx+C28Khq6eCZZCv7xG06Kgj7l27fIqE GmqrYF3SvUkZHF1q9/Egfi/0p+WwigThgkhMhqfn1qiLBuqgGLfYQCUILFKZ9B4ldi hVJyo2YN6qkoTHKymBhn1yjYdnAm0W4lCQhk5eQTYNjVZndEhwwI7/m2pvdqQzWBmb ZZdhWHtc+a8xhwXJk31nWffbfUXF35VOplox/WFzZAm9hl6tqN0BlOU7VZHfJvHVp9 CRPIymMivu+xeZxYXmUu4Nc99DTxMbtdffkoXNhS27bzxRhfmrVjhm8yJfUyn5A7TI Xez27ItqiHGHQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Y5Kwk2PHRz6twC; Sat, 7 Dec 2024 21:48:53 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <86ttbfism4.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 07 Dec 2024 14:29:23 +0200") Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; keydata= mDMEZBBQQhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAHJuofBrfqFh12uQu0Yi7mrl525F28eTmwUDflFNmdui0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiWBBMWCAA+FiEEDg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwMFCQHhM4AFCwkI BwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwulikAEA77hloUiSrXgFkUVJhlKBpLCHUjA0 mWZ9j9w5d08+jVwBAK6c4iGP7j+/PhbkxaEKa4V3MzIl7zJkcNNjHCXmvFcEuDgEZBBQQhIKKwYB BAGXVQEFAQEHQI5NLiLRjZy3OfSt1dhCmFyn+fN/QKELUYQetiaoe+MMAwEIB4h+BBgWCAAmFiEE Dg7HY17ghYlni8XN8xYDWXahwukFAmQQUEICGwwFCQHhM4AACgkQ8xYDWXahwukm+wEA8cml4JpK NeAu65rg+auKrPOP6TP/4YWRCTIvuYDm0joBALw98AMz7/qMHvSCeU/hw9PL6u6R2EScxtpKnWof z4oM OpenPGP: id=7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66; url="https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66"; preference=signencrypt X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:296602 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Cc: 74556@debbugs.gnu.org >> From: Philip Kaludercic >> Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 11:34:51 +0000 >> >> Philip Kaludercic writes: >> >> [...] >> >> > It might make sense to try and "deactivate" a package before installing >> > the new package. Looking into some second-try fallback for >> > package-install to refresh the package index if a package was not found >> > would also be a good idea ^^ >> >> This might do it? > > Philip, please install this on the emacs-30 branch, unless you see any > problems with the change. We'd like to make another pretest soon. Done. But we should keep the report open as there might be better approaches to discuss in the future.