From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Suhail Singh Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#74844: 29.4; m-buffer: Broken Top Directory node in Info manual due to malformed Texinfo direntry Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 13:46:32 -0500 Message-ID: <87v7vkyebb.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87zfl0bc7o.fsf@gmail.com> <87cyhuey26.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <86r069s9dp.fsf@gnu.org> <87zfkwygsi.fsf@gmail.com> <86frmorejn.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4101"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: yantar92@posteo.net, 74844@debbugs.gnu.org, Suhail Singh , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 15 19:48:31 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tMtfL-0000uf-Hg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2024 19:48:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tMtf7-0005Gc-0e; Sun, 15 Dec 2024 13:48:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tMteu-0005Fo-87 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2024 13:48:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tMtet-00078l-D2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2024 13:48:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=K7QxywSaNl5HMKv9nhJFfGg5amdabcDGnAuN21oVrUs=; b=LqP7ZSeuMfb217IVahLrDMO3QB3Nbalk1EtoUlpXjYRnmo/2ZHVQ+TrIDErJ02tDHOjozyLtG/Fi/8wjt3a+qmrpD3d3B0C9uHYj3HAuYvIqLBt4ety6KSnOvJFZIsQBG4pnz9HZHgrcmYD1xHtilryvaMIz9jiaN20AUaVSjonP7lHM785F3aSQATp/b8DMDbLq/boG7FG2vLxTo3lPq3krDSZwEmK2L6UsaLNPbuk8KJJQVEJyGJs9XdMgL/GiOs09fU1l+7pCOJ2bPDkTiebS2H4JeiIGVlZFFsWAB1TFVskVtxwW5HGriaNo5ql7Kg3A099wcpMA7bHTkT40Sw==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tMtes-0004sJ-Bj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2024 13:48:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Suhail Singh Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 18:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 74844 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 74844-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B74844.173428847418723 (code B ref 74844); Sun, 15 Dec 2024 18:48:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 74844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Dec 2024 18:47:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52073 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tMtej-0004ru-Pu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2024 13:47:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qt1-f195.google.com ([209.85.160.195]:60557) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tMteg-0004rf-6J for 74844@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2024 13:47:51 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qt1-f195.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-467918c360aso42246171cf.0 for <74844@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 15 Dec 2024 10:47:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1734288404; x=1734893204; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=K7QxywSaNl5HMKv9nhJFfGg5amdabcDGnAuN21oVrUs=; b=Eq8rAZ5d8iqbKbWKwqr14XymNOlzB3ZLyiLm587bTUBi2Skj5ARVJcZrILA/bkKRDl /lK1k+rtnA9/dySrSwVpmhOX79cMdFVGJbm819dNpp1d6PscvQiHCuO/VLb+Qpk93pje dRC3B6ultUXM6FMTU1T19Ayxj8sqlbPdyiGZpNZpnJLqlmpcGJpXfBzJeUvqJTnt5GjN 9txOzoHV2Ccf4pfnNdSz7yd9VrpoUA1ZkBGHFRmDiatee0gpzdsG4ELhGgQg0tW498kC mgOaXKkbVK/C/0xjU+mPI02VaWnHcvYsYtYwZcerChfKqll4X89AcPZ3kDyc3BjD0Uac TFXQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1734288404; x=1734893204; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=K7QxywSaNl5HMKv9nhJFfGg5amdabcDGnAuN21oVrUs=; b=jJ7WqpmWJH8SNuseiBNn1rhaSsYk7KScuffIFudW6USfp0PFEvU1zlXLdFvuC/FRhP psrqH3gkqIJI0rtpiIL8gwPUevpXSBUwkfQlZsT9iYRI3meIMvMoy99TrbKqbXU/R8Ws FDEtJRQulboB+Xl30BzpX6aZ4XQYtGasuP9zPeIMaBq6t3WojBvIceI+iWerKnX2lP/e w9pgOf2O37YK7VjIc18/U/eHvYRzXGuFrYDU0nvb7Txk0kHUtTNfNCqOP90yJbwLN7ka GEGKd5dPJpzGzXea8cl0M0cBMFUuIcBADlfpC8454fVGbSkLir09bZpJFiDBqkTcaxJ7 1MTQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXZYawIpUvItzPRBcK8RvWXGKheuLS7jPhlASFvBjfgaBkobgR2RQUzqjtmLLPvlc4q1qhjLw==@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx+1q9AKj/VJ6U6fw6kRY/FNbmBz6ZO1FOvuUoukfl+mfxAGddD o6ttpGjmKTLuK0PNvFMigAtNJwOPe0jKZmZiThcHSZ8sJhuJwPBiIlSgvc6V X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctHlg9o515m30sC3dM5PJAI7k7yKv329FYVH6r5IMt1fmkXv9irtXYbzf9GhqW GxApHl3SCgTEQWHImN8rx8MxqpGzC/iinzIdfWxA/DQsLJHE+lJYCptU5HUPii7hF3oHW2NQDLo rmFTPcg3ID7M5q9woIjQ30IZaHCxfud5TxHKwLwlgRpYp5zZKXuN3yiOFP1qURd52p7AmIkqIMN eNvW/PW5zW+Qn+wJ5ZkEHKwuAhyI7Tgw8kVq22PKaJBnChxnLIx X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IExZ8D5M0pa26Soj7vmLYD79YV4EUVl9xN3YN57qX6vAJmLzkOEa9GM781snJe9sHVIUrCkQw== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7e8f:0:b0:467:6b96:dc5a with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-467a58478bemr149929401cf.47.1734288404302; Sun, 15 Dec 2024 10:46:44 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from gnus ([70.26.179.129]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d75a77b69052e-467b2e83169sm19277101cf.61.2024.12.15.10.46.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 15 Dec 2024 10:46:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <86frmorejn.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 15 Dec 2024 20:23:24 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:297126 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > Why do you suggest removing TEXINFO_DIR_TITLE >> >> Because of this comment in ox-texinfo.el which suggests that it is >> obsolete: > > FWIW, I disagree with that decision of Org folks. The decision to rename TEXINFO_DIR_TITLE to TEXINFO_DIR_NAME? Actually, looking into its history it seems that that particular change was made by Stefan Monnier in b0c3c90574ed79a63e56acaeee156ef8d9593233 in the org-mode repository. >> > and TEXINFO_DIR_DESC? >>=20 >> Per (info "(org) Texinfo specific export settings"): >>=20 >> #+begin_quote >> =E2=80=98TEXINFO_DIR_DESC=E2=80=99 >> The directory description of the document. Defaults to the title >> of the document. >> #+end_quote >>=20 >> The Org document in question already has a TITLE specified. > > That there is a default does not mean that we need to discard the > description when we do have it. Discarding it loses important > information (which programs like install-info use). I don't understand. The generated Texinfo file will use the TEXINFO_DIR_DESC keyword as the description if provided. If not, it uses the TITLE. The TITLE and TEXINFO_DIR_DESC in m-buffer-doc.org are currently identical. I.e., the generated Texinfo file should be identical even if TEXINFO_DIR_DESC were to be omitted in m-buffer-doc.org. I'm not stating that it should be, only that it could be without causing any changes. And the only reason I mentioned this is because of the following comment in m-buffer-doc.org: #+begin_src org # FIXME: Shouldn't `ox-texinfo` use sane defaults like the file's name # for TEXINFO_DIR_TITLE and the TITLE for TEXINFO_DIR_DESC? #+end_src If omission of TEXINFO_DIR_DESC results in a variation in the generated Texinfo file, then perhaps a bug should be opened against ox-texinfo. --=20 Suhail