From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10169: a simple interrupt evokes abort?! (but only with (require 'saveplace)) Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 10:08:57 +0800 Message-ID: <87ty5hytom.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4ED7A551.5080803@cs.ucla.edu> <871uso6zjh.fsf@rho.meyering.net> <1bliqwtb8h.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <82aa7cyv5z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1322964590 3063 80.91.229.12 (4 Dec 2011 02:09:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 02:09:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dan Nicolaescu , Paul Eggert , 10169@debbugs.gnu.org, Jim Meyering To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 04 03:09:45 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RX1WS-0005xD-0l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Dec 2011 03:09:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36763 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RX1WQ-0004yD-Sh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 21:09:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39600) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RX1WN-0004xt-Mr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 21:09:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RX1WM-0003pR-MF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 21:09:39 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50857) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RX1WM-0003pN-JQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 21:09:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RX1Wj-0002zu-Sv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 21:10:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 02:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10169 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10169-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10169.132296457411480 (code B ref 10169); Sun, 04 Dec 2011 02:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10169) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2011 02:09:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RX1WH-0002z6-Dz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 21:09:33 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RX1WF-0002yz-K1 for 10169@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 21:09:32 -0500 Original-Received: from bb121-6-69-237.singnet.com.sg ([121.6.69.237]:39650 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RX1Vq-0006s9-Oh; Sat, 03 Dec 2011 21:09:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Sat, 03 Dec 2011 23:23:40 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 21:10:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54668 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > Dan Nicolaescu writes: > >> How does that that justify introducing another severe bug: can't kill >> emacs using C-c (as it has always been possible ? > > C-c in an interactive shell doesn't kill it either. The argument is invalid: here, Emacs is not using C-c as keyboard input. This change is worse than the bug it is trying to fix. Please revert.