From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9119: [PATCH] modernize function definitions in gmalloc.c Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 23:31:56 +0200 Message-ID: <87ty0ns4hf.fsf@gnus.org> References: <4E24C5DC.50709@gmail.com> <8362d43v58.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334352777 29646 80.91.229.3 (13 Apr 2012 21:32:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:32:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@linux-m68k.org, 9119@debbugs.gnu.org, dan.colascione@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 13 23:32:55 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SIo6q-00077j-Vu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 23:32:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49808 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SIo6q-0006O6-B3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:32:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37307) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SIo6m-0006Nk-M4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:32:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SIo6k-0006zF-VB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:32:44 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:32971) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SIo6k-0006zB-RR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:32:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SIo82-0004s8-Es for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9119 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 9119-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9119.133435280618685 (code B ref 9119); Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9119) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Apr 2012 21:33:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57742 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SIo7S-0004rK-06 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:33:26 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:44719) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SIo7Q-0004rB-9r for 9119@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:33:25 -0400 Original-Received: from static-195.22.91.6.addr.tdcsong.se ([195.22.91.6] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SIo61-0008B7-Aw; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 23:31:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8362d43v58.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:15:15 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130004 (Ma Gnus v0.4) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1SIo61-0008B7-Aw MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1334957517.41513@oC+0Kld5YEfJhoj5vag2Ow X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:59014 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> So would it be OK to apply this patch, then? > > Yes, please. For some reason or other, patch won't accept the, er, patch: patch: **** malformed patch at line 19: === modified file 'src/gmalloc.c' I can't really see anything wrong with the patch by eyeballing it, though. Odd. Dan, could you resend the patch as an attachment, by any chance? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Sent from my Rome