From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16573: 24.3; Auctex (11.87.2) in Elpa issues hundreds of warnings on compile Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 19:09:34 +0100 Message-ID: <87txck9g69.fsf__7882.15955622054$1391191871$gmane$org@thinkpad-t61.fritz.box> References: <87a9ee8u1y.fsf@thinkpad-t61.fritz.box> <87ppn9nbn4.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhxxn4rn.fsf@gnu.org> <8761p1mwpm.fsf@gnu.org> <87ob2sbmpv.fsf@thinkpad-t61.fritz.box> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391191858 4382 80.91.229.3 (31 Jan 2014 18:10:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 18:10:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Mos=C3=A8?= Giordano , Neil Jackson , 16573@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 31 19:11:05 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W9IYO-0000Aj-Bm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 19:11:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57433 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9IYN-0004Vh-UR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:10:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40787) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9IXj-0003nL-Af for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:10:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9IXd-0005wO-OW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:10:19 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57650) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W9IXS-0005kp-MR; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:10:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W9IXR-0004T1-Ru; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:10:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tassilo Horn Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-auctex@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 18:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16573 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,auctex X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16573-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16573.139119178817143 (code B ref 16573); Fri, 31 Jan 2014 18:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16573) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2014 18:09:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43436 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W9IXD-0004SR-Fk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:09:47 -0500 Original-Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:36042) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W9IX8-0004SF-GA for 16573@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:09:43 -0500 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.44]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BB620C84 for <16573@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:09:41 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:09:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=/MgXXbPRMpxQMtgr34FP6kop35w=; b=OZzOqyNkA20RHkbbKnuawdKeM/rl O3MHadV/l2JMG1nST5285V2icDhIK3txejguX22EWcIQ3CBVkbYQ4lN8xRTBunrd X64ATfce1WLJ0b+scO7keqBldnNKpJgQ91CF77ak3JYqBbYZbdJKlMeTSoceGZEn 8nYdKJkNh5QwSa0= X-Sasl-enc: rwRcvSz7W1l9N3S6PvwqiLTYLPr8ASfosjx/UipvWkn9 1391191781 Original-Received: from thinkpad-t61.fritz.box (unknown [95.88.145.206]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 025FBC007AB; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:09:40 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:38:07 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84370 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> That's ok. But if the style files were compiled, adding the requires >> into the style files would make the compilation take minutes, because >> each style file compilation would need to load the core files first. > > Yup. I personally don't see much need to add the `require's in those > style files. Then again, I'm not too bothered by lingering warnings. The problem is that the mass of warnings makes it hard to spot warnings that are really defects. However, now I've seen that adding requires to the style files doesnt't help in the case where one style files uses vars/funs from another style file (e.g., there's pstricks.el and several other sub-styles that use funs/vars from the former, because they can assume that it's loaded beforehand). But style files can't be required cause they don't provide a feature... Bye, Tassilo