From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daiki Ueno Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17625: 24.4.50; All installed packages marked "unsigned", no archive listed Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:47:06 +0900 Message-ID: <87tx77w54l.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> References: <87tx89ffax.fsf@pellet.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <2vvbsnrgpk.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87mwczagnm.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ionna453.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1403830098 4417 80.91.229.3 (27 Jun 2014 00:48:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:48:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17625@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 27 02:48:11 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X0KKo-0003wp-49 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2014 02:48:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47519 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0KKn-0007ug-JX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 20:48:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47155) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0KKk-0007uX-P5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 20:48:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0KKg-0000QD-5j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 20:48:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42955) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0KKg-0000Q2-3N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 20:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X0KKf-0002S2-Mv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 20:48:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Daiki Ueno Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17625 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17625-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17625.14038300389332 (code B ref 17625); Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17625) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2014 00:47:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34105 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X0KJx-0002QQ-Kr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 20:47:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:36582 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X0KJu-0002QG-U9 for 17625@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 20:47:15 -0400 Original-Received: from du-a.org ([2001:e41:db5e:fb14::1]:34162 helo=debian) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X0KJu-0005NT-Hq; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 20:47:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 26 Jun 2014 15:51:25 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:90868 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > - Keep track of which archives have signatures and which don't (e.g. by > assuming that if `archive-contents' has a sig, then the packages also > have sigs). This sounds like a good heuristic (like the way YUM does, IIRC). It can reduce the number of confirmations.