From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Peter =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=BCnster?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18522: 24.4.50; mapcar is very slow Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:25:10 +0100 Message-ID: <87twkypfqx.fsf@roche-blanche.net> References: <8738bkdjqg.fsf@micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org> <8737so5neo.fsf@gnus.org> <831t87re7a.fsf@gnu.org> <87bn7b3hnz.fsf@roche-blanche.net> <83lh6fpv4z.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9h2xr9k.fsf@roche-blanche.net> <56C99AD0.2000309@gmx.at> <87wppywbaz.fsf@roche-blanche.net> <87d1rquo4a.fsf@roche-blanche.net> <878u2eun9o.fsf@roche-blanche.net> <834md2niqt.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2lyszy2.fsf@roche-blanche.net> <83bn79n66p.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb5hry9y.fsf@roche-blanche.net> <83r3g4lnor.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3g4o4uw.fsf@roche-blanche.net> <83h9h0jwfo.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvqru119.fsf@roche-blanche.net> <8360xfjsyr.fsf@gnu.org> <878u2bs7tl.fsf@roche-blanche.net> <83r3g3iajr.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456309585 9934 80.91.229.3 (24 Feb 2016 10:26:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:26:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 18522@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 24 11:26:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aYWe5-0008BM-Ob for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:26:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34946 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYWe5-0000Ug-82 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 05:26:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50339) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYWdz-0000RP-AL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 05:26:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYWdu-0005J8-Bu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 05:26:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45369) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYWdu-0005Il-2L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 05:26:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aYWdt-0002eP-Rg; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 05:26:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <8738bkdjqg.fsf@micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org> Resent-From: Peter =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=BCnster?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18522 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18522-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18522.145630951810138 (code B ref 18522); Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18522) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2016 10:25:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42495 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aYWdC-0002dR-AI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 05:25:18 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp04.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.126]:34610 helo=smtp.smtpout.orange.fr) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aYWdB-0002d8-5Z for 18522@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 05:25:17 -0500 Original-Received: from micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org ([2.14.65.45]) by mwinf5d39 with ME id NARB1s0020yazV603ARBcx; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:25:11 +0100 X-ME-Helo: micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org X-ME-Auth: ZHJwbUB3YW5hZG9vLmZy X-ME-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:25:11 +0100 X-ME-IP: 2.14.65.45 Original-Received: by micropit.roche-blanche.homenet.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DB6A9F3BF; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:25:10 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113700 Archived-At: On Tue, Feb 23 2016, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > We need to time that loop to be sure. Can you do that with 'perf', How please? > or add a call to gettimeofday before and after, and see how much time > it takes as the list of buffers grows? Then, I would need to restart emacs. If it's possible to measure the time without restarting it, that would be better. -- Peter