From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23092: 25.0.92; Minibuffer completion fails to resize completion window if reused during same command Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 16:56:03 -0300 Message-ID: <87twjygucs.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87fuviigpw.fsf@gmail.com> <56F17F1D.4050201@gmx.at> <877fguicbk.fsf@gmail.com> <56F194C7.8000001@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1458676644 7994 80.91.229.3 (22 Mar 2016 19:57:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 19:57:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23092@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 22 20:57:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aiSQR-0000na-CN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 20:57:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39363 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aiSQQ-0007KO-Iz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:57:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44434) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aiSQL-0007GN-NB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:57:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aiSQI-0000bj-Gj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:57:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35095) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aiSQI-0000be-Cp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aiSQI-0002EJ-7b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 19:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23092 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23092-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23092.14586765728515 (code B ref 23092); Tue, 22 Mar 2016 19:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23092) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Mar 2016 19:56:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60455 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aiSPU-0002DH-L5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:56:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f182.google.com ([209.85.223.182]:34902) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aiSPS-0002Cz-KL for 23092@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:56:10 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f182.google.com with SMTP id o5so169835195iod.2 for <23092@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 12:56:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=embeUZSH/jE86WJgsx8z0rpBeSh3EsSs/vka6jGFupU=; b=viCQr+ytd9G6oKYadxXfxaZtn4otfa9VTxhyhcBGHI4kl0nSSUCHxp81xg1Z7o7rMB GXy/R/A+FvfiCzB5RtFowQ77MDPwnbsOTXFR1zUDiwnkxoi3O+dAeF3P+TRxMOVF6dzO yZ4sL+aUvrAaywT66GQdszEjcbFXrrGBM3Kiw3g2cQ7hY+/VNwxUk5/+dxIPOu5zoOGn WMhJnsjWRakUmcPd6KtkO4UnEt5iaLeGQ+1B81dd/e80/IiooA674vMdNXLvsrRowVws 5BQuPcfCS1Q5iak6PSVlLLNfoSigTg10J1kHIESjU98QHCkf6GLyZVPwe6isKEUNu/7t OhKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=embeUZSH/jE86WJgsx8z0rpBeSh3EsSs/vka6jGFupU=; b=EKCfg+WQL3UAHIS+owiZBQ2w6gZAeVAQPreOAQ9m+V19cu1d1lmMWNM3IQOwOItzuO kEOo0CTS8q0uJINFFNd10IWfq+hu3gDkohh0M44BSUHXh8vKolmTxM8x/+4uuG+bORq8 J95IaipDD8sJbcSvIMjvqZk3tD3rUJhbN91BxVH00wPi8kTi4NbE9tUG2E7L2VaMx6gh ekPyn/G0S8TOProO6i90of3Lidkk5uKHOncsyUtYaePyXfx8GgQ6CUcfhg+r4zObql8Q yfbhI3A0477m86t4sUrY8WhFfnixpgAW0e5QIiWvBOWfuxrkfbWCEDk15GkhVAoIRKwc Md2A== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKNsZ9r5lqTi9jwuR7As1FBZ2cDb15S70A10lQ8tF4d0+bSeR5+QFKBteGD2dC2hQ== X-Received: by 10.107.33.7 with SMTP id h7mr35507789ioh.30.1458676565059; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 12:56:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from moondust.nodomain.none ([142.227.16.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d19sm14016835ioj.32.2016.03.22.12.56.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Mar 2016 12:56:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <56F194C7.8000001@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Tue, 22 Mar 2016 19:53:59 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:115363 Archived-At: Hi Martin, At 19:53 +0100 on Tuesday 2016-03-22, martin rudalics wrote: > > displaying two, three completions in a window that occupies one half > of your frame does not strike me as a good solution either. For me though, this seems absolutely fine. After all that window is only there until I've finished my command in the minibuffer, then it disappears. So it doesn't really matter to me how few completions are in it. (If it was taking up so much space that it prevented me from seeing something I needed to refer to while completing my command in the minibuffer, that would be another matter entirely, but with the completions window occupying the right half of the frame that was never an issue for me in Emacs 24.) N.