From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28523: 25.3; Unable to run 64-bit GNU Emacs 25.3 on Windows 7 Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:13:33 -0400 Message-ID: <87tvykbuo2.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <86o9q5uarc.wl-chriszheng99@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1509110069 18399 195.159.176.226 (27 Oct 2017 13:14:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 13:14:29 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=BC=A0=E9=B8=A5?= , 28523@debbugs.gnu.org To: Chris Zheng Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 27 15:14:23 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e84Sl-0003bi-8l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 15:14:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57294 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e84Ss-0003Ja-7z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:14:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45869) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e84Sd-0003Dx-JP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:14:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e84SY-0005le-Oc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:14:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55648) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e84SY-0005l8-Kt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e84SY-0006jB-6o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 13:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28523 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28523-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28523.150911002425830 (code B ref 28523); Fri, 27 Oct 2017 13:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28523) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Oct 2017 13:13:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36096 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e84SG-0006iS-JR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:13:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f177.google.com ([209.85.223.177]:46348) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e84SD-0006i4-LJ; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:13:42 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f177.google.com with SMTP id 101so12604884ioj.3; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 06:13:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OTTqjXuDvsKIH/xbDyj0GBxy7N4KqB4BFaxIG+MHp8M=; b=cfpidElVJgcYCbOiMJ4zzjhqlG3aaqhobPPwaN97Y1viFLsWrVZ9Zxam9y4lcZILqY JWz9O9zYluEqDcv61p7YEtI+8arkFbtnyhuGf7fHl3LlH9Cn85tkYPO98DtWk0VR/QsE 1nvz/9hp3nAlV6ZtgiIfQ9Pu/b5CQPLo5atsZp7ZTk1ZwZFNr88F0VYf95yq40b6zsD6 1FS24IuGAkb/4vY1e8O5xFVrZuM8SHtK6blnTj7teMBAr6iRiTuz0rFMbtAVEsABm7Mk oJJexg/6w/Volq0C3biIRLO4KRDQrrd/FJFhRyEkgjHrwiXKNpujNMSwxUZ5NZ0LFpy1 pLFA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OTTqjXuDvsKIH/xbDyj0GBxy7N4KqB4BFaxIG+MHp8M=; b=HpKWgkoaoCJDSF4llCXpwGaoQvx7ezxJsQ7tUVJj7KyIPTrZqYJ9oFZFT+c3CICd+c yP099AV9AOX+KbHtNsqRDG5Nw++bovTfuGNBh+28wZF3/tL16WKQI1IqiUwGUE/axoWa NXzbuQPU0EPxVhSpDXBh9G6aoGl3s3I3JXl7jvQvo57TzPS+rLw+BDjqv2KOulp7f6lx ajjTHm0iQOp1689IHQLEaDfXHYqGxc2/06FPeSKr4nNGSKRrnvvIu0MDu9sS0Sw3ROAl KlXjnEvvz4R0Y6fhVZ2ZLQ0DudnYsOrR87O+71rg9TUg3F6tcWOc3eg84SmxblSkFXDL Nyaw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaWrFd3eKnyyjeOulkp5UvOKETpEPO5mTJFGnQGUlENnIcO36BX/ /fhCVFwfoI4qm3160o6x2Lfslg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+QynoigjfBFHU1oTIrpgMb1/d6COx9oQks+Vf3y8zMtrh39VqN1B1vRktgX9+tM7IQ2i+aHJg== X-Received: by 10.107.53.131 with SMTP id k3mr538329ioo.199.1509110015486; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 06:13:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zebian ([45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id z2sm891683ite.26.2017.10.27.06.13.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 27 Oct 2017 06:13:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86o9q5uarc.wl-chriszheng99@gmail.com> (Chris Zheng's message of "Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:47:35 +0800") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:139070 Archived-At: tags 28523 fixed close 28523 25.3.1 quit This is fixed now with the 25.3.1 release, see https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/emacs-25.3_1.readme. Chris Zheng writes: > Hi, > >> Now I have to use the 3rd-party build from > >> https://github.com/zklhp/emacs-w64/releases/download/e0284ab/emacs-w64-2= 5.3-O2-with-modules.7z, > >> which is much smaller than the official one. I am so confusing :( > > I build it with optimization, as the name =E2=80=9CO2=E2=80=9D suggested.= And I use > a higher compression level. There is nothing wrong with the size. Indeed, a "solid archive" format like .7z will always be much smaller for collections of many files than a format using per-file compression like .zip. And also it uses a more effective algorithm by default. You should rather compare sizes after decompressing. By the way, the official builds should also be built with O2.