* bug#35213: Summary commands to go to the next/previous unseen article
@ 2019-04-10 0:50 Michael Heerdegen
2019-07-09 15:56 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Michael Heerdegen @ 2019-04-10 0:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 35213
Hello,
this is a request to add commands `gnus-summary-next-unseen-article' and
`gnus-summary-prev-unseen-article'; analogue to
`gnus-summary-next-unread-article' and
`gnus-summary-prev-unread-article', but for unseen instead of unread
articles.
These commands would fit a, I think, quite common use case: you read
mails, but you're short of time and didn't read everything so you leave
unread articles. When you check the next time, you may want to have a
look to only unseen articles to see if there is something new that is
important.
You currently can only do / . (`gnus-summary-limit-to-unseen'), but you
loose the thread display, so being able to move by unseen articles would
be comfortable.
Thanks,
Michael.
Gnus v5.13
GNU Emacs 27.0.50 (build 20, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.5)
of 2019-04-09
200 nntp.aioe.org InterNetNews NNRP server INN 2.5.4 ready (posting ok)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* bug#35213: Summary commands to go to the next/previous unseen article
2019-04-10 0:50 bug#35213: Summary commands to go to the next/previous unseen article Michael Heerdegen
@ 2019-07-09 15:56 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-07-09 16:41 ` Michael Heerdegen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2019-07-09 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Heerdegen; +Cc: 35213
Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> writes:
> this is a request to add commands `gnus-summary-next-unseen-article' and
> `gnus-summary-prev-unseen-article'; analogue to
> `gnus-summary-next-unread-article' and
> `gnus-summary-prev-unread-article', but for unseen instead of unread
> articles.
Sounds like a good idea. What keystrokes would these be bound to?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* bug#35213: Summary commands to go to the next/previous unseen article
2019-07-09 15:56 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
@ 2019-07-09 16:41 ` Michael Heerdegen
2019-07-09 16:51 ` Michael Heerdegen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Michael Heerdegen @ 2019-07-09 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen; +Cc: 35213
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
> > this is a request to add commands `gnus-summary-next-unseen-article'
> > and
> > `gnus-summary-prev-unseen-article'; analogue to
> > `gnus-summary-next-unread-article' and
> > `gnus-summary-prev-unread-article', but for unseen instead of unread
> > articles.
>
> Sounds like a good idea. What keystrokes would these be bound to?
I have no clue. , and . would be cool and intuitive, but they are
already occupied. I have no preference for other keys so far, maybe
others have a good idea.
Michael.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* bug#35213: Summary commands to go to the next/previous unseen article
2019-07-09 16:41 ` Michael Heerdegen
@ 2019-07-09 16:51 ` Michael Heerdegen
2019-09-29 7:44 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Michael Heerdegen @ 2019-07-09 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen; +Cc: 35213
Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> writes:
> I have no clue. , and . would be cool and intuitive, but they are
> already occupied. I have no preference for other keys so far, maybe
> others have a good idea.
Quotes are unused: '´` - maybe these would make sense? I think these
new commands would be used quite frequently, so a one-key binding would
make sense. If I was me, I would really vote for , and ..
Michael.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* bug#35213: Summary commands to go to the next/previous unseen article
2019-07-09 16:51 ` Michael Heerdegen
@ 2019-09-29 7:44 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-09-29 7:57 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2019-09-29 7:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Heerdegen; +Cc: 35213
Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> writes:
> Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> writes:
>
>> I have no clue. , and . would be cool and intuitive, but they are
>> already occupied. I have no preference for other keys so far, maybe
>> others have a good idea.
>
> Quotes are unused: '´` - maybe these would make sense? I think these
> new commands would be used quite frequently, so a one-key binding would
> make sense. If I was me, I would really vote for , and ..
` is free, but ' is taken, and we need a key pair.
I use the current `.' and `,' commands quite frequently, so I don't want
to rebind them.
The summary keymap is very... full... But one unshifted pair that's not
taken is [ and ].
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* bug#35213: Summary commands to go to the next/previous unseen article
2019-09-29 7:44 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
@ 2019-09-29 7:57 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-10-05 14:31 ` Michael Heerdegen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2019-09-29 7:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Heerdegen; +Cc: 35213
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
> The summary keymap is very... full... But one unshifted pair that's not
> taken is [ and ].
I've now done this. If somebody has better ideas for the key bindings,
feel free to modify.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* bug#35213: Summary commands to go to the next/previous unseen article
2019-09-29 7:57 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
@ 2019-10-05 14:31 ` Michael Heerdegen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Michael Heerdegen @ 2019-10-05 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen; +Cc: 35213
Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
> Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:
>
> > The summary keymap is very... full... But one unshifted pair that's not
> > taken is [ and ].
>
> I've now done this. If somebody has better ideas for the key bindings,
> feel free to modify.
Thank you very much. I am happy!
Michael.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-10-05 14:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-04-10 0:50 bug#35213: Summary commands to go to the next/previous unseen article Michael Heerdegen
2019-07-09 15:56 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-07-09 16:41 ` Michael Heerdegen
2019-07-09 16:51 ` Michael Heerdegen
2019-09-29 7:44 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-09-29 7:57 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-10-05 14:31 ` Michael Heerdegen
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).