From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17127: `call-process' circumvents password concealment w/ `read-passwd' Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 05:16:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87tv8dcp3g.fsf@gnus.org> References: <871txntb60.fsf@nbtrap.com> <87y2y7gogl.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="155231"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 17127@debbugs.gnu.org To: Nathan Trapuzzano Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 13 05:17:18 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iJUNh-000eEq-Tx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 05:17:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37326 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iJUNg-0002e7-NQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 23:17:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60069) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iJUNb-0002bA-0T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 23:17:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iJUNS-0000PN-P4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 23:17:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54101) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iJUNS-0000PG-MH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 23:17:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJUNS-0006QI-D3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 23:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 03:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17127 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 17127-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17127.157093657422400 (code B ref 17127); Sun, 13 Oct 2019 03:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17127) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Oct 2019 03:16:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34686 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJUMd-0005n8-Od for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 23:16:13 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:47676) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iJUMb-0005ko-Hn for 17127@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 23:16:09 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iJUMW-0003p4-4G; Sun, 13 Oct 2019 05:16:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y2y7gogl.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 29 Sep 2019 16:35:22 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169093 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >> "foobar" is printed in the minibuffer rather than "......", whereas, >> e.g., yanking from the kill ring print dots. > > The following patch fixes this, I think, by using post-command-hook > instead of after-change-functions. > > It seems to work for me -- does anybody see a problem with doing it this > way? There were no comments in two weeks, so I've now applied the patch. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no