From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33005: 27.0.50; Data loss with Gnus registry Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 16:28:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87tv8ajd6d.fsf@web.de> References: <871s8yvsrq.fsf@web.de> <87in29x33z.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r2gxygox.fsf@web.de> <87efcxwzr2.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <874ldtlcks.fsf@web.de> <87ftxdl7w1.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <878t33cjf2.fsf@web.de> <87o8za4gbl.fsf@web.de> <87mueuicys.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87d0fgnik0.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87v9srzm9g.fsf@web.de> <87ftjvz045.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="89434"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 33005@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 15 16:54:35 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iKODW-000N00-Co for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 16:54:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47430 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iKODU-0002Um-8P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:54:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36939) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iKNov-0007z5-Eo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:29:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iKNos-0000lt-Nr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:29:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35837) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iKNos-0000lW-AY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iKNos-0005Sf-3v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 14:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33005 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 33005-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33005.157114972020961 (code B ref 33005); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 14:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33005) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2019 14:28:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44658 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iKNoV-0005S0-QT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:28:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:45797) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iKNoS-0005Rl-SA for 33005@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 10:28:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1571149699; bh=6s9sMfL/NkSKPTi+pW2l6S6FryAucU3EVaqLvkjioVg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=C6rumTPAYkQJhHqcs0BmBAr7nphgRbCE/kTU9j22a1/HBpY4wJjjpINZl6kWH2Kp+ /VdT+HFj8sl6/YUnJg1ZfUSPeOf25A/Amm/f9bArUyIvF4TEH5ZmLVMNrG8fVTJm2t q5e/gTczjFiVbNIDoBlv6bQapyPshNsKEvG6bJ/c= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([94.218.222.9]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb003 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Ls92l-1hvBlN3SIx-013ygT; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 16:28:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87ftjvz045.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Mon, 14 Oct 2019 10:51:38 -0700") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:oS8ryHP1DwQRIxj6Wbrpl5SpLSpCib8CJAXp40tEN0mQeJTO2v/ xe95YiKiGSXN1D7Os8eQgpIVjIWvlTma+x1gac295mhIcTwHOKtMsB23gggM+YO2ZsLehUp ydLMnDGBVeunFTEQjoFbgqsAjld+sASBewc9uZM1vhg+JDo6V2ky6QTzbvSg8QWHuvVmE7A fMBMXxnqFXsDPS+nIXmMQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:R1SGtrrhVnc=:05cf7yHJSi0upM/1dIwRd7 TsM0m7RMoPFAgzXzRkJMHUcuO6OwPromA70mU51ZBVf09zCRfrlQoyq8XRPH0QRhG0d3pstTM J3BofI4KFpQwMm4FmW4w+qSccG6OEZPiQfvIgt+gCaMjs4w+3TbvN8h/aY9etKqyfaig+67wL ZNDu5Bhtgm9ySJdWmpumFdQ3hTiJKiZAG0b6Sox9OnT82ho9+DiYHyiEXBBkKLPZefoCvE7WD n4FBObx/oorUk/GrvMRm1DOj7Wl0XnUPXEhPHILSqrXLKLRDr4N4TSr6SxVPsIkpRPNj3sRNw VMorcXtMD0tV2nxPWMGR/MFBj8OwnKR+UEg3qt8FMstH2V/Ib24PAuD7Y3/LI+lKClKl0hs64 G/ngev8Et1o2Gh1TSM+HY2ICTswAs8fVl8+QINO03qafxaYxVyTXvN26Witk03t8y4PRm5m38 dP7Ir42qZ1RZ3Pk16rg41K7bwk7f/ed0UM/9R7nSpLnW4GjBCZaJ8AcyoV7jgOtzbIyzvWakk HUieXAxmlsr3yuAWS9WtanrhuzOXWrln3C016MrYLoJ50FJ68Kq49IGgnZJDiXhkz4P7uRbNQ copx88Xr1Naw9YjS50ne4KVcNmycPPFTuHcCJ5Ka5xL2hvK1jn8BEGKup+EtarpNZ7UWDABPr L//vjahoaOD/LAbtMxQ6Pk5IMTXFQfzbNgVbYtxNuDxESgkO39ymQMU3TrWvwSSzyqCAT3pHv eY/aGqRJa0LGMw/gXMXBDXCQopRr4rX0rHFjqEtNThlkqX/SEH/lLLufDARD09QDVSG/gcnY X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169381 Archived-At: Eric Abrahamsen writes: > In the interim, you can set `gnus-mock-emacs-program' to point to an > emacs executable in a source tree checkout, and it ought to work fine. Would it make sense to change the default of gnus-mock-emacs-program to something like (expand-file-name "src/emacs" source-directory) or similar? Oh, and you also noted that part > Sorry for the bad news - but my registry marks are disappearing again > :-( Just after restarting Gnus they are gone. in one of my previous messages, right? Regards, Michael.