From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37829: 27.0.50; Overlay behaviour changed without documentation. Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 13:16:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87tv83fz0n.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87d0erssxl.wl-all_but_last@163.com> <83mudv65jd.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="238924"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 37829@debbugs.gnu.org, Zhu Zihao To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 20 13:28:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Nc-00102W-IF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 13:28:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59570 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Nb-0000AM-Cu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 07:28:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36133) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Cq-0006oz-Ve for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 07:17:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Cp-0004jc-PQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 07:17:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45082) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Co-0004jI-NR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 07:17:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Cn-0005Do-Po for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 07:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 11:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37829 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37829-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37829.157157017717961 (code B ref 37829); Sun, 20 Oct 2019 11:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37829) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2019 11:16:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53903 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9C4-0004fO-NM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 07:16:16 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:45858) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9C1-0004cB-7I for 37829@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 07:16:14 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iM9Bx-0006Wo-9Z; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 13:16:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83mudv65jd.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 20 Oct 2019 14:05:26 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169788 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Crystal ball says it's because the mode-line face doesn't have the > :extend attribute by default. If so, this change _is_ in NEWS and in > the ELisp manual. Hasn't there been sufficient fallout now from this change that we should consider doing the :extend stuff the opposite way? That is, default to the old behaviour, and if we want certain faces not to extend, then we put in :extend nil on those faces. This change breaks a lot of out-of-tree code. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no