From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37528: 27.0.50; Can't view gpg-signed messages in Gnus anymore Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 22:56:58 +0200 Message-ID: <87tv81om05.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87r242hlad.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnjmei4u.fsf@gnus.org> <87k19ua2fx.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <874l0xolnt.fsf@gnus.org> <87lfu9viqm.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="217156"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 37528@debbugs.gnu.org To: Amin Bandali Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 21 22:58:15 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iMekp-000uIr-3J for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 22:58:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47838 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iMekn-0003XZ-Ot for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:58:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42392) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iMekd-0003Tj-Qf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:58:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMekc-0005bv-JQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:58:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49138) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMekc-0005bn-G9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:58:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMekc-00030m-DN; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:58:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37528 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus Original-Received: via spool by 37528-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37528.157169143011505 (code B ref 37528); Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37528) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2019 20:57:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57956 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMejm-0002zU-D5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:57:10 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:52340) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMejf-0002z2-SA for 37528@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:57:04 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iMejb-0004fn-7o; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 22:57:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87lfu9viqm.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Amin Bandali's message of "Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:53:05 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169952 Archived-At: Amin Bandali writes: > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > >> Sorry; I first fixed this in one way yested, and then I changed it and >> apparently didn't test the check: The test I had for whether we were >> doing decryption of checking whether it was signed was reversed. >> >> I've now fixed this -- could you pull again and see whether this fixes >> it this time? Sorry for the confusion here... > > Ah :) no worries; it works, and I can now read signed messages again, > thanks! Great; thanks for checking. I think I forgot to close this bug report, so I'm doing that now. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no