From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38497: 27.0.50; Frame is not rendered when frame-resize-pixelwise it 't Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 18:21:13 +0800 Message-ID: <87tv6fjco6.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <87wobbjlm0.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <7caf72bb-1dc0-6e6d-430a-5c28295fb80c@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="222839"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" To: martin rudalics , 38497@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 05 11:24:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1icoIt-000vo3-2r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 11:24:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52632 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1icoIr-0003pI-Pb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 05:24:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33920) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1icoIm-0003ou-3G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 05:24:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1icoIk-0005Gt-Qa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 05:24:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37061) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1icoIk-0005GG-Jh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 05:24:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1icoIk-0001dl-Ex for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 05:24:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ihor Radchenko Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 10:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38497 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38497-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38497.15755413906225 (code B ref 38497); Thu, 05 Dec 2019 10:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38497) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Dec 2019 10:23:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43034 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1icoHt-0001cL-J8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 05:23:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pg1-f180.google.com ([209.85.215.180]:42278) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1icoHs-0001c8-8u for 38497@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 05:23:08 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pg1-f180.google.com with SMTP id i5so1393876pgj.9 for <38497@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 02:23:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=1hLWfkIr8nhtVU7jW8MvZcEu7lNYNMdHQ11WRVhim4g=; b=J3YqyJQ4oHDJcLRtGQ76bluqfuBVAgQNGMKgru3f93lA+qYYt+JSNR34crWqwdwfeT 0FWm82PxC9X775bg6hvB/QW9+f2GhjajDK1FH/5TjJq5qa99dMXi9gMR0T6glY+zMpUb CUwlU0dz/kS7ODoLAKhHYiDKsEOenO84e0Z9tyYRTmZCO0ysI5+AKe6EeyyAiYJbp8mS WGG2xr8fSymiV59+cjG+6BGG9cvQGASfVYEcaRXlnBciN4v4bIsvidQZbc/Pjam8tB5g LTcQlam50m6X8XuJckSl7NktirCWJnsznr/0P9l6GOVkTMM0rgGbzDdfou+36nT21pQu yAbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=1hLWfkIr8nhtVU7jW8MvZcEu7lNYNMdHQ11WRVhim4g=; b=CXu3nG38/wr3f41i3Vp0TaYSWWfit+u88/6e++ZIYHiogYq7Ot74v+WQ4UONyWBaXn x2YUnzBYTYrJafsiOdHuP+oFUQFhimlCfVWGO76DSpfvaMlcJs1faHLSUja+OO52QLsN 0mJ8aMKXYj6gSIKxp04NhwLeaJoeVKNomXcbBjXxkYml8KcgYVcQwscJErWrDc+9AQeY 5P1Ircbs8YSd4BuLfEZh/CVZYZCeaxnP0K9UUqEWN4RzDROUuI5s+kqd3Zm1R3+WC+/L s5Y1Ty4tU+lC2MX6N7GeK8n2lKOu2CIbBciyEkUKs15tA0MpWJQm+0R6m5pATMBTDYiF GPZg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVdIQM6rKLIEG1c9radEtP5fqp5XL+RxnNAIy8TnThNFopV3XlD kczkqYTwZN3Cocpnrq/Fb7k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyoHYL/SivNU5F62NkvB/rQGYRhQ8beGStTwn+ZdqvVam9l1IjuB1X5M1TsBV5Ggls9ewwxVQ== X-Received: by 2002:a62:aa13:: with SMTP id e19mr8124702pff.36.1575541382301; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 02:23:02 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([104.250.131.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z29sm11314915pge.21.2019.12.05.02.23.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 05 Dec 2019 02:23:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7caf72bb-1dc0-6e6d-430a-5c28295fb80c@gmx.at> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:172884 Archived-At: > Many window managers can only maximize a frame, full screen is > something the application has to provide by herself (via , for > example). The missing title bar seems to indicate that your frame is > full screen, is that right? Does the frame then redraw when you hit > F11 twice? Does the problem happen with maximized frames too? Oh. I meant maximised, not full screen. Initially, I observed the issue with maximised emacs frames. (My title bar is located at the bottom of the frame, not on top). > It would be interesting to look into what the differences between the > two are ;-) I also tested the actual full screen (if it matters, I use Awesome WM). The problem persists. However (!), there is also no rendering when using set-face-attribute in full screen. > Could you try with a GTK (or Motif) build whether they exhibit the > same behavior? I have tested using both GTK and Motif. The rendering is all right with those builds. Best, Ihor martin rudalics writes: > > A while ago I noticed that pop-up org-capture frames are not rendered > > (no buffer or mode-line text is shown, as in attached image) when the > > window manager forces them to be full screen (floating frames are > > rendered as usual). > > > > The issue seems to be triggered by the combination of > > maximised frame, frame-resize-pixelwise 't, custom-setting a certain > > default font, and loading certain colour theme. > > Many window managers can only maximize a frame, full screen is > something the application has to provide by herself (via , for > example). The missing title bar seems to indicate that your frame is > full screen, is that right? Does the frame then redraw when you hit > F11 twice? Does the problem happen with maximized frames too? > > > ;; Using this instead of custom-set-faces does not trigger the rendering problem > > ;; (set-face-attribute 'default nil > > ;; :foundry "adobe" > > ;; :family "source code pro") > > (custom-set-faces > > '(default ((t (:foundry "adobe" :family "source code pro")))) > > ) > > It would be interesting to look into what the differences between the > two are ;-) > > Could you try with a GTK (or Motif) build whether they exhibit the > same behavior? > > martin