From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34035: 26.1; Arabic shadda-kasrah renders incorrectly Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:48:20 +0100 Message-ID: <87tuwyx66j.fsf@tcd.ie> References: <87y37sv38f.fsf@nexoid.at> <83zhs8gx50.fsf@gnu.org> <878seb12v1.fsf@tcd.ie> <87v9hfrok6.fsf@rub.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2098"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 34035@debbugs.gnu.org, Stephen Berman , Peter To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 19 12:50:53 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k8LgC-0000Pv-BO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 12:50:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58818 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k8LgB-0007Tp-E1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 06:50:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39446) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k8LeT-00064K-DJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 06:49:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54716) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k8LeQ-0003hk-AQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 06:49:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k8LeQ-0006iJ-9L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 06:49:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34035 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34035-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34035.159783411325773 (code B ref 34035); Wed, 19 Aug 2020 10:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34035) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Aug 2020 10:48:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38029 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k8Ldw-0006hc-VR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 06:48:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pg1-f169.google.com ([209.85.215.169]:33435) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k8Ldt-0006hN-Ls for 34035@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 06:48:30 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pg1-f169.google.com with SMTP id o13so11227155pgf.0 for <34035@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 03:48:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd-ie.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=NkbiWPmNSdAiQ8qDsB6v9bY4bXGw1ayO9F6LKxT84l0=; b=uu/X9NS6Hla9ngNZpOAuIYSgvSyw9EWm25AzF+uywSpwbqy5dLWBfCxB11gIJJGUVj y/+6Pk3AsmXqDQcCfeeprLpzW3GSQbhzFRBgZYgTixJiasBX1vN/Q3ryGyXpKosIQuLR 0y0nTmpkbsFXpu9koQ11hOjVOt6XJXssHN0axUJAvBy2h15fiDvz+Ya9D4L6e1adeaJo AwiTm4e/lH+BM9bsC18OBkBOogSxzTRKrdNKxf99GoMHmCD79xaE/2o/SCNYNMKoSsFO p4mrLw8Jh1b9fkj/Dbm138tSVt+yfVny8CcklygaUgQLyPBpoThF/pXGrn3jcaHJhzm0 gYyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=NkbiWPmNSdAiQ8qDsB6v9bY4bXGw1ayO9F6LKxT84l0=; b=RAcobPwHqAl+l7D95Kj/E4Z3RxzcTr0bE+arkJLdN0rDy+Ns1j8TLQ5gzap+i/G+ri rzmsV/JAL8sdN8SxDHMi8dEy1CZzWGFV5nv6Q4TIFBFs/ZpTQJYEcpIsvG/OnOQqjoFF 1rvuhikCPS0tsfH8ehFKOt2EhnE8hVbQPShRMjfsM611jxDlyc/To+mX8Gc1aC7hi/VR zleR8p7bYxJ60prEZC7njIUFV6XPA9EdNEseD1kAt9+KS7nWYTYVJ3oYoEWD7XlqNFNW MA1fZfHz31yysZy6vFg8SipTStEdtiA0mH7nNQxz2YBw8UFneAElQOR9FizC/wzugWba p47g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531uGC20ieFEBzUk9R1vKXtpa+h/x71GXHlJpW6cwadfw0gqPQms wqic6/oY6j8HtQpEs+4dFJErdA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJws+zMi0nYGrub7lvsNRnZP8vkfwxIs32gZluGF2mmPVXIWSc9cxNbFxRccYJwEex6pPadlSg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:6a47:: with SMTP id f68mr16175826pgc.170.1597834103814; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 03:48:23 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([2a02:8084:20e2:c380:8238:830f:7113:8756]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z77sm29833050pfc.199.2020.08.19.03.48.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 19 Aug 2020 03:48:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:49:37 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:185569 Archived-At: Stefan Kangas writes: > Stephen Berman writes: > >> This seems to be a font issue independent of Emacs, e.g., I also see the >> same thing in LibreOffice Writer: with DejaVu Sans the kasrah is >> correctly displayed between the shadda and the seen, and with DejaVu >> Sans Mono, the kasrah is incorrectly displayed below the seen. > > I can confirm that the font Emacs uses to correctly display this for me > in "emacs -Q" is: > > ftcrhb:-PfEd-DejaVu Sans-normal-normal-normal-*-48-*-*-*-*-0-iso10646-1 > > I also tried LibreOffice Writer, fonts "FreeSans" and "DejaVu Sans Mono" > seem to be broken, while "DejaVu Sans" displays it correctly. > > Does that mean that this is a bug/missing feature in the fonts, and not > in Emacs? Sounds like it, though I'm curious whether Eli's concerns in https://debbugs.gnu.org/34035#35 still apply. Thanks, -- Basil