From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44020: 28.0.50; Prefer selection of colour emoji fonts? Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:35:05 +0200 Message-ID: <87tuuqfwau.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87tuuvtl5n.fsf@gnus.org> <83tuuvwcd8.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6wmwjod.fsf@gnu.org> <20201016193041.GA1166@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <87o8l1z7al.fsf@gnus.org> <83k0vptdvq.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfg4klay.fsf@gnus.org> <83362bshl1.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39938"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 44020@debbugs.gnu.org, alan@idiocy.org, rpluim@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 19 10:36:39 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kUQel-000AIY-GH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:36:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36682 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUQek-0006IN-Ay for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 04:36:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35430) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUQeA-0006IE-H9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 04:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56615) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUQeA-0006sA-7m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 04:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUQeA-0005jT-38 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 04:36:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44020 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44020-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44020.160309651721975 (code B ref 44020); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:36:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44020) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2020 08:35:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39928 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUQdR-0005iM-34 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 04:35:17 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:60230) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUQdP-0005i9-8B for 44020@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 04:35:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=lNMLub8xuNwacSkX7prd99PiOPz3ZsaWexy79M2Uk14=; b=ONyxZENuIkAr7rX1Q7Np8un1s4 OdQEK9dHdSHuceYWbudntP9IvqMkDBGoEhwTr3N4eaoBleAof7bekz0o4DusnMITV4zQ96lI1QKDe 6gYaOrS7JbqohPx8IaRk40FMwVaJh94AL6PEw4VnUEZglc+plszp56HRtp5nXAruKq5w=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kUQdG-0005Du-4P; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 10:35:08 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAG1BMVEXW1NT7+vqaoLSC gX4RFiAaMWAuXLFnjNL///+RzdFuAAAAAWJLR0QIht6VegAAAAd0SU1FB+QKEwgMMM1iPfwAAAGm SURBVDjLtZTBTsMwDIadTBrXjCcIZiTXaYUXgLQPgJZyRZWaXKcA8evjtM02ISGQEN7Uuv7y20nc FOA723xjfwElrxJfAIiNmEuqjfhVKgXsKMG608j5fr1Hiah3Wt+gvrlUaJAgtRAaEMSPNVa3iNg0 zR5nY3c3ge3B994550c/GbtPMwh9zBwMs41MHhcQkg3eR8oT8YcK+pDAjH1CYsss8RXkafARLAFS 0VRgpxQoKSlZNAu46xMhK0wMEWQCqsCEhGAjmRBismVMBZEYpGlORKkUeZ5r3POaY0phAlQKLsXf nrXpMZWw5QlSGBcwGL321oZoU6aLWW1fVq9rH3MEXkgqCxmXGi84mEO3PnLLJcbzrLZdDN61JLhJ cDVcgDY+HJw/2kAAOfKsanEfPpzjrR+48RRYcFL02bmWE8kCOF63vfUjA3OUrDCjPzfKdZyqG64y IRrPfTqDdwa8NO7kWOJnwA9diLy7eYq3M7h3bXk4vSInsGoW2zfN7eztfnjbVTmK6st5rECpcgWh VPkvoASKL8pZ498fT239Hij4reI/wSfC5rg96R7ECQAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMC0x MC0xOVQwODoxMjo0OCswMDowMBv7BCQAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjAtMTAtMTlUMDg6 MTI6NDgrMDA6MDBqpryYAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Motorpsycho's _Roadwork vol. 5 (2)_: "Un Chien d'Espace" In-Reply-To: <83362bshl1.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 18 Oct 2020 18:02:18 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:190963 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > It does -- for some value of "check". Opening a font and trying to > find a glyph for a character is expensive, so Emacs tries to avoid > that as much as possible. Instead, it uses less expensive "checks" > that don't require actually opening the font. The details are > somewhat complicated (and I'm not sure I have a sufficiently clear > picture of them, nor that we have someone on board who does), and the > are to some extent font-backend dependent, but they have to do with > the character's script, the script's characters in > script-representative-chars, and system APIs for finding fonts that > support those. And the first problem with Emoji characters in this > context is that their script is 'symbol', which doesn't allow us to > assign an Emoji font to them as a script. Ah, I see. Thank you for the explanation. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no