From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Colin Baxter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48179: bookmark-fontify [PATCH] Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 11:46:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87tungdtr2.fsf@yandex.com> References: <20210503001358.mjafsjlumdamrlvh@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87zgxcdzh3.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503091204.qhc2tda76wh6345w@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87im40cgxz.fsf@gnus.org> <20210503095828.66mcqkxyznb2vdja@E15-2016.optimum.net> <87v97yan85.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmy5io91.fsf@bzg.fr> <87a6p8fdrq.fsf@yandex.com> <87o8do1bs2.fsf@gnus.org> <20210506102416.u2ykzjtwffbfveis@E15-2016.optimum.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10956"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: Bastien , , Lars Ingebrigtsen , 48179@debbugs.gnu.org To: Boruch Baum Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 06 12:48:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lebYB-0002hq-Ok for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 12:48:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44088 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lebYA-0000Mo-Rh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 06:48:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60720) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lebY2-0000LR-VP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 06:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54027) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lebY1-0005sJ-MH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 06:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lebY1-0002cf-L6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 06:48:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Colin Baxter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 10:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48179 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch fixed Original-Received: via spool by 48179-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48179.16202980298375 (code B ref 48179); Thu, 06 May 2021 10:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48179) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2021 10:47:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37340 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lebXB-0002Ap-0F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 06:47:09 -0400 Original-Received: from forward100o.mail.yandex.net ([37.140.190.180]:49108) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lebX8-000243-B4 for 48179@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 06:47:07 -0400 Original-Received: from forward101q.mail.yandex.net (forward101q.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c0e:4b:0:640:4012:bb98]) by forward100o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id A0FEF4AC1B6A; Thu, 6 May 2021 13:46:59 +0300 (MSK) Original-Received: from vla5-eeb6b78db372.qloud-c.yandex.net (vla5-eeb6b78db372.qloud-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c18:340d:0:640:eeb6:b78d]) by forward101q.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 9D732CF40026; Thu, 6 May 2021 13:46:59 +0300 (MSK) Original-Received: from vla1-1bc5b51c612f.qloud-c.yandex.net (vla1-1bc5b51c612f.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c0d:89c:0:640:1bc5:b51c]) by vla5-eeb6b78db372.qloud-c.yandex.net (mxback/Yandex) with ESMTP id DYoXrwQNpa-kxG8iAC5; Thu, 06 May 2021 13:46:59 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1620298019; bh=MVb899DiLxkC9PcFrBiaZjkPttDSu7A0iNW0IxG2urU=; h=In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Cc:Cc:Date:References; b=yZ+ckyxb7/1/kfoFZIkqh3xopFVwtieUGV5Q+egA9yjU3uWZgF/kjVlm/a8qKYfiz SgGzxBGI67N0hPk68lSZDAlW4sFuRMgU9ynHOtlK05GFg3UOuDbuibvhmOnQrGc5Em nFm1AIxV2KdlWshgxbeU1bTOSXZjt0z4baNHN4BM= Authentication-Results: vla5-eeb6b78db372.qloud-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com Original-Received: by vla1-1bc5b51c612f.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id ITOleGMFx7-kwLSBZVC; Thu, 06 May 2021 13:46:58 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) X-Face: BHjiJOg/Qmj'BQgsAKL@])L)e62P)C"Y=6T In-Reply-To: <20210506102416.u2ykzjtwffbfveis@E15-2016.optimum.net> (Boruch Baum's message of "Thu, 6 May 2021 06:24:16 -0400") Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAGQAAAAeBAMAAAAodabAAAAAB3RJTUUH1wQdAAY04/L8hgAA AAlwSFlzAAAewQAAHsEBw2lUUwAAAARnQU1BAACxjwv8YQUAAAASUExURc7OzpwAAAAAAP////8A AGNj/2aqqTQAAAA8SURBVHjaYzA2NnEBAmdj01D8wNgYpM7F2JiBgYFREAgEGJiU8AMGBpA6QaCG UVtGbRm1ZdSWUVsGjS0Aq20lJnMawnkAAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:205812 Archived-At: >>>>> Boruch Baum writes: > On 2021-05-06 10:55, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> Colin Baxter writes: >> >> > I have turned bookmark-fontify off because I found it too >> confusing with > a feature of bm-bookmark >> , which I > use. I believe >> bm-bookmark is popular. >> >> Can you describe the confusion in the interaction between this >> package and the new fontification? > I also use package bm.el. For me, it acts as a replacement of > pacakge bookmark.el (once modified with two features that I've > submitted as PRs to their upstream[1]. I can't speak for Robert, > but I find the two packages totally overlap and so confusing to I can't agree they overlap - bm-bookmark allows multiply bookmarks in one file. I don't believe that that can be done via the built-in bookmark. Best wishes, Colin.