From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
To: "Francesco Potortì" <pot@gnu.org>
Cc: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>,
21162@debbugs.gnu.org, "John W. Eaton" <jwe@degreesofgray.org>,
21150@debbugs.gnu.org, Kurt.Hornik@wu-wien.ac.at,
Mike Miller <mtmiller@octave.org>
Subject: bug#21150: 24.5; octave-inf mode does not need --no-line-editing
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 00:58:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tump6r1g.fsf_-_@gnus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1ZL6Zl-0002nR-TE@tucano.isti.cnr.it> ("Francesco Potortì"'s message of "Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:26:01 +0200")
Francesco Potortì <pot@gnu.org> writes:
> -(defcustom inferior-octave-startup-args '("-i" "--no-line-editing")
> +(defcustom inferior-octave-startup-args '("-i")
[...]
Francesco Potortì <pot@gnu.org> writes:
> As a conclusion of my observations above:
>
> A. if --no-line-editing was introduce because of the Emacs inferior
> Octave mode
>
> B. if it is reasonable to assume that --no-line-editing is not used by
> any other application
>
> C. if there is a way to leave readline enabled, but disable tab expansion
>
> then one can change the --no-line-editing behaviour to just disable tab
> expansion.
>
> Or, if only C is certainly true, one can deprecate and undocument
> --no-line-editing and add a separate option --disable-tab-expansion for
> use in Emacs inferior Octave mode.
I'm going through old bug reports, and after skimming this one, I'm not
quite sure what the conclusions are. Should the --no-line-editing value
be removed from the options?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-26 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-30 17:22 bug#21162: adapting octave-inf.el to Octave 4 Francesco Potortì
2015-07-31 6:47 ` Glenn Morris
2015-07-31 9:26 ` Francesco Potortì
2015-07-31 15:39 ` Glenn Morris
2015-08-06 13:15 ` Francesco Potortì
2021-05-26 22:58 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen [this message]
2021-06-08 13:09 ` bug#21162: bug#21150: 24.5; octave-inf mode does not need --no-line-editing Francesco Potortì
2021-06-09 9:35 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-07-28 13:40 Francesco Potortì
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tump6r1g.fsf_-_@gnus.org \
--to=larsi@gnus.org \
--cc=21150@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=21162@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=Kurt.Hornik@wu-wien.ac.at \
--cc=jwe@degreesofgray.org \
--cc=mtmiller@octave.org \
--cc=pot@gnu.org \
--cc=rgm@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).