From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#54263: 29.0.50; color-values-from-color-spec accepts whitespace in rgbi: specifications Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2022 20:28:32 +0000 Message-ID: <87tucccff3.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87v8wswcsf.fsf@posteo.net> <87fsnwfccq.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4725"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 54263@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 05 21:29:21 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nQb1k-00015h-SR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2022 21:29:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36332 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nQb1j-000544-DO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2022 15:29:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58936) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nQb1S-00051G-T7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2022 15:29:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55250) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nQb1S-0004vw-LI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2022 15:29:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nQb1S-00065O-BR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2022 15:29:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Philip Kaludercic Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2022 20:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54263 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 54263-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54263.164651213623384 (code B ref 54263); Sat, 05 Mar 2022 20:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 54263) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Mar 2022 20:28:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49147 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nQb1L-000656-Nh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2022 15:28:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:55853) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nQb1G-00064o-Vr for 54263@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2022 15:28:53 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29F38240026 for <54263@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 5 Mar 2022 21:28:44 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1646512125; bh=LSqzSj1D7mY75t95S8qIULde34C7g7wzCqfzUuYZ/9M=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=VcWkLwErhDSqaWtvcirlHBoQYQsPsfSO583pv5ws6ayCmn/8z+0yMv2vvcEL3DbnG i5uIfZCh6hCopFyG+ayr0D8eOZOewrgL5I40N9NR9Ntmnbqy3T+pQr8/Z8EicssRu6 nqH5u+dyqQMisyAM2nJqsMTEzyugIxcWHeIHtGGDSm2sSs+kbFTapOnC1Jc52WIa5T 49D/LxABUmhTcSyVWsjLa+lnvXdCdjkNT+gN4hhgoBsSIJ5FJt9rG7ho9a3iqpInCc OTNWW5h3alPuGPZ7YX/UWNgJhGznnF+b+swVBjWGP5SFXTxUQxyyvLNu4zk/J/o7Bh 7VcGP01RwTZCw== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4K9xBh1l84z6tm9; Sat, 5 Mar 2022 21:28:43 +0100 (CET) Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; prefer-encrypt=nopreference; keydata= mDMEYHHqUhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAp3GdmYJ6tm5McweY6dEvIYIiry+Oz9rU4MH6NHWK0Ee0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiQBBMWCAA4FiEEDM2H44ZoPt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJ CAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQtVrAHPRh1FyTkgEAjlbGPxFchvMbxzAES3r8QLuZgCxeAXunM9gh io0ePtUBALVhh9G6wIoZhl0gUCbQpoN/UJHI08Gm1qDob5zDxnIHuDgEYHHqUhIKKwYBBAGXVQEF AQEHQNcRB+MUimTMqoxxMMUERpOR+Q4b1KgncDZkhrO2ql1tAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEDM2H44Zo Pt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwwACgkQtVrAHPRh1Fw1JwD/Qo7kvtib8jy7puyWrSv0MeTS g8qIxgoRWJE/KKdkCLEA/jb9b9/g8nnX+UcwHf/4VfKsjExlnND3FrBviXUW6NcB In-Reply-To: <87fsnwfccq.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 05 Mar 2022 20:06:29 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:228043 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Philip Kaludercic writes: > >> I am not certain if this is intended, but the "rgbi:" specifications >> appear to tolerate whitespace >> >> (color-values-from-color-spec "rgbi:0/0/ 0") >> >> despite not being documented. > > If we were designing this function now, then being stricter here would > be a good idea. But if there's code out there that relies on the > current sloppy parsing, then it'd be problematic to make it stricter. > > On the other hand, I think that function was introduced in emacs-28, so > perhaps that's not a concern in practice? I haven't seen the function being used anywhere up until now (which doesn't have to mean anything), but considering that this is a relatively niche edge-case I would say that the bug should either be solved now or never. -- Philip Kaludercic