From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#54289: 29.0.50; Emacs ignores xmodmap Super_L assignment Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 14:55:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87tuc8sg59.fsf@gmx.net> References: <87pmmyt2oj.fsf@rub.de> <87v8wpl1ok.fsf@yahoo.com> <87pmmxl1k0.fsf@yahoo.com> <87o82gu8ps.fsf@gmx.net> <87fsnslpp6.fsf@yahoo.com> <87k0d4u4lw.fsf@gmx.net> <878rtklov8.fsf@yahoo.com> <87fsnsu35u.fsf@gmx.net> <87wnh4k88p.fsf@yahoo.com> <87bkygu0yf.fsf@gmx.net> <87r17ck6g4.fsf@yahoo.com> <877d94tzvj.fsf@gmx.net> <87h788k3b8.fsf@yahoo.com> <8735jstw4s.fsf@gmx.net> <87a6e0k1nq.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24136"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 54289@debbugs.gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 08 15:06:52 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nRaUE-00060c-LQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 15:06:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40140 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nRaUD-0005RQ-Df for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 09:06:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48204) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nRaJm-00020Y-K5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 08:56:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33425) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nRaJm-0005g8-3M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 08:56:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nRaJm-0000l4-2X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 08:56:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stephen Berman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 13:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54289 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 54289-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54289.16467477252865 (code B ref 54289); Tue, 08 Mar 2022 13:56:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 54289) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2022 13:55:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55555 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nRaJB-0000k9-2i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 08:55:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:55229) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nRaJ9-0000ju-Ki for 54289@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 08:55:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1646747715; bh=vh7RXPMNtbggD5r0eJ3MgoF4tZ2PuawqKaxEjlHUSsw=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=RwNXQEhZRDFjlwCpASXvKvrAWkJlUYAAmvFqcOMk9tKycpcVrX6oVf1SaEFZggkIm TVmzzuDq04GZ4MpBVU4fcPQzgV2qEKJ/Rp09D2IV+3HFUD5W76984c28brRl2A+Ovx Oaw2IuSqzoIaxOIxBSIpanuEHQLVh3f8O3udOdZ0= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from strobelfs2 ([89.246.36.100]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mr9Fs-1nurOX2SUI-00oCnj; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 14:55:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87a6e0k1nq.fsf@yahoo.com> (Po Lu's message of "Tue, 08 Mar 2022 21:35:21 +0800") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:tycvXBtBvZwAebRe2aHeg0Qj8W1w3ZiVVV9FnijCL0aVcqLqNvv 55etLeZEq3eMDYWvuPhnsW1wBS2qhcFPW51DH80l9JWPyZt4EsmgBidINJ27yrzRIMm4Ply mKTSOK3caFr5ExsjTSd/sb9iK/IUhnJ7SI+BV+Pk2I/Mbsw6b7/xvXWnTmQ60/21+y10oKj PN9j2HcnfU/sCp4skjZFw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:2NA235G2e+Y=:q92Ul7bMSxl2RP+v03Gu69 kvI8izpuYbwFeYTb6mv8Qzc2RbT6HwkY3RxqRH5MI2arny2fdVvBDHcy/u3yIrSHomlXqDdTU 6W37s1qDPr5bC0viLwhUHjl4wnaaNL7xqcv7unMNvufYTjG+pPzNfzFLAC6dT4cQBesLazS6x nIs6MxDA4ChrmVJkDLg3V7BzqjXoFcTy/oEt1RsTtxEXNrgDcXItSOTVbrqyqb5m7cn05IEM5 P+Ei7qlbm1bArRxdw4z0DrN7cf+AVQl4Dn8LMDFyxQdY6jcMYoPYrvrGcVZIMMSCFJbobVDtH GgRK0TYExPNIyY+UCW/TAhOOBH0lt1+OnpC8e2Y/UB6qEy9b590ikuYsA4U93Xrg/n7LMRky7 hyBLFVY2jdkeYLG2fkzoJtPfYf3HfIV6y8aDjna4b2S2x3c4PCv8iXDzivFpI1wDzeRilqphH bbM2inE8dhi/3WVKJB8Af7wRFc5f4Iu6UnMwrz3/DkIkyAJ3zyk8+kA4uLy29kqEj87bPcdub YQ+GUgexH6EA0kinwKOq3IDWBhnPJ6tubZUcYUioifhl74E8igrfAptAwKDw/1fOr1B71gYny u47MKuodhphT+CfPn0S0Rf37MbGXG8J2fH6VqjV/+MvTCSciLeJfrBz8kodeG7iU49Lyx20hd PrqsN+cICAaYKM+hqzuKlcGg4m4w5VRlJr74vG1KSoZtSU9E3SKLNqFGHa2WEUSEYtr7MKEnJ j+NZIxD8hVOkVILaeHQg6CiWBXwctuR/YHihNwxoXGKV57fOwftiepVonRkC47Xnb/h+Arj2 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:228147 Archived-At: On Tue, 08 Mar 2022 21:35:21 +0800 Po Lu wrote: > Stephen Berman writes: > >> With that Super_L (the Windows key) is again recognized as `/' in >> emacs-29 and also in Firefox. > > That confirms it's not really a bug in Emacs. But I will look for a > better solution to this problem (the commit which introduced this > problem was originally put in to satisfy buggy input methods which act > on modifier keys, but don't filter them out). Thanks. Thank you, I appreciate it. >> Why does this work but having the mappings in .Xmodmap doesn't? (I >> also tried putting those three mappings after the five mappings I've >> been using for years in .Xmodmap, but it makes no difference.) > > As for that, I have no idea. Well, at least you've given me a workaround for now. Thanks. Steve Berman