From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Po Lu via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#55208: 29.0.50; MS-Windows GUI selection dialogs and double-buffering Date: Sat, 07 May 2022 16:26:39 +0800 Message-ID: <87tua17npc.fsf@yahoo.com> References: <83mtg15jg9.fsf@gnu.org> <87levkpwma.fsf@yahoo.com> <83czgpzt7n.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Po Lu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20956"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.91 (gnu/linux) Cc: 55208@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 07 10:27:15 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nnFmV-0005FJ-2P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 10:27:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42990 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nnFmT-0007MT-Rq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 04:27:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36750) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nnFmI-0007Kn-O2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 04:27:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56451) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nnFmI-0001Sf-DY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 04:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nnFmI-0003Vn-7x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 04:27:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Po Lu Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 07 May 2022 08:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 55208 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 55208-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B55208.165191202113492 (code B ref 55208); Sat, 07 May 2022 08:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 55208) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 May 2022 08:27:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50348 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nnFmG-0003VY-VA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 04:27:01 -0400 Original-Received: from sonic304-20.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.191.146]:36478) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nnFmG-0003VM-8k for 55208@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 04:27:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1651912014; bh=wjlSfYFWbvZxfQth1mQRXuv/bRBxWeGTIuYNtS6w76E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=hvU6J767il5bst5gGIltSjc93PsmQHR/lS2QBchCD7wgKu6xVvE2BmaOim5GU8g//ADuZf+iA2UC6ChFoibxWLqbGW6J+2kbnkjF8UaXwrm6Du7wP5qE+HPS288a48DRhd7jHOcirZXa6I+RuqE0lcmMMRp2r/+YGfz/WFW//6OpgmeoEF17z8GQRecRd+mXYpLZ+/Pndm4kQfgsZ0xvQQ+WSoU+ZevSEITrrfEwcSpbprKSRyKiUdS2sZLY+yotx3JFElVpEIv6fyF3UXs7GmjijkCGZv7oCVaZxb7i4E2mFeHr6QKmLJeisKk6yyUqrx29XjaON213MSxFE3WYnw== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1651912014; bh=34x8wRpyI0gPz7LJoQkPSZuSx50jxw1SftX146yj91N=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:To:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=HO3bIpi6+J//fIFFaXYtuAM7EFfk9YrX90ZzNtHr1ATq92rJus/GDYf790Wy1StFERfV/bQ2nSUReurQUTL4oZMISfYc34C6XPr3MeGAaH0Mfd90OcYQJtfta7wOEqJI4lA4wWpSsysMZwQMKsyf3KrPjFtdSE8CKBjfPfTtww+k0duE7QVKWcQqCIGD9/yTfud03o/zw2d6hlgp7ZRSDj8F7zSMQ3LaWC7fodHJ2NAPZSAnSGc/adzWi3uItspUN1TYm73ypCHmXcMw0rYxdGipReUAjQlXPeB0kZZiCTGff2g54ltBBu9jO8V76jmRThL8LEEmelA6Upzoiue8+g== X-YMail-OSG: 1QdpB8YVM1kob5YR99yuG8sS1KxRGa3ED9RpN8LHbJ41ZoYRxEYslpmhLLXN1cW Gh8lqkJ5DrIEmeqThVM9D3ZAZC8v0LnN7cyU2Pcqzfn5YPFMP9mmsxtPnU9dXGGrFiSpTtrqS74o G3nVoRZT4rnw2tnE3XH9BxoSyS8Ej92GOvhpfgYXOW49DRsZS5ifgRHGxqEQmZv_8ACnN0C_Nc3P 0pABzuNvjoPu_dG81zeGsdZuy2iQX.QOM483hH2GYlZcGRWgeWuRPaDW05vOHSuBubjGXWkoB.9G xp9CgMRMOxS3.ntE05kSRLLAIjGGBp.y7_8ugf2sfsSKyyRDwtl2A8v5pR2rAKQmeMAJ67c5C0ZF _MYGXfbGwWym3fCWtgNj3FXSAo323kIIBfdWvSaCyLciBxMS1wYb.Wh.op_wKMNcah_Xp9vbeQUZ bZN3ykhkEOzdtnOTXfGVhRjssasvAZQ._YRBhUddO8Gxm9izsMvoaNakDpL6Tt32H3vlQTe27QKq eLfA_ADuUQ0X.r7raqOiECYNJByfp.ZWlZ__Aha267AyIouT0kPCt2EybAeWrcZSSzofDLCFsQY4 7DexYtu.XexoHuw4mCq8sK.DFI9OjvZcsSiV1XYS3VX7dw8ImKFjF6GPiRsORmzoPW_v.08ERG9m UTWRm6E.AmbE_2DWWM8D7IWUMYTSrs6.Vil3uArg0w1xeHoPVQ7q7ef_p9DxoLqC7gKtLn27ZpYf in9_8fGh_PL7fCl88p5fdi7e0KgtsugYhOPyseDTH1Rla20kxPWVMhz4xXxP2Dv_zNYUQjY4seHc h15OiJi2THfBOKmz5yXCGo..OCIIMndvloLTwUwpyc X-Sonic-MF: Original-Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic304.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sat, 7 May 2022 08:26:54 +0000 Original-Received: by hermes--canary-production-sg3-795d7b4d54-hh7m8 (Yahoo Inc. Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID e80263716690b44b54bff1a2b7baa217; Sat, 07 May 2022 08:26:43 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83czgpzt7n.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 07 May 2022 10:40:12 +0300") X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.20188 mail.backend.jedi.jws.acl:role.jedi.acl.token.atz.jws.hermes.yahoo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:231558 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > w32_msg_pump doesn't handle WM_PAINT, so I'm not sure what you mean > here. Also, AFAIK w32_msg_pump runs in a separate thread, so is it > safe to call BitBlt from that thread? Sorry, I meant `w32_msg_pump'. But it should be safe as long as the painting is done inside the critical section, which protects all modifications to the paint buffer (and its handle.) > I do know, but the above issues bother me more, so I didn't yet try > this. I tried to explain above, thanks.