From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2252: python-load-file in python.el does not seem to work Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 10:42:17 -0400 Message-ID: <87skjmqmd2.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> Reply-To: Chong Yidong , 2252@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241362358 13332 80.91.229.12 (3 May 2009 14:52:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 14:52:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 2252@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Mikko Huhtala Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 03 16:52:30 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M0d3N-0003e0-NZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 16:52:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41678 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M0d3N-0007FS-9Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 10:52:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M0d2y-00077m-GG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 10:52:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M0d2r-00075v-In for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 10:52:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56454 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M0d2q-00075W-Ul for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 10:51:57 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:43486) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M0d2q-00038Z-Cm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 10:51:56 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n43EpquU021659; Sun, 3 May 2009 07:51:53 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n43Eo61K020520; Sun, 3 May 2009 07:50:06 -0700 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Chong Yidong Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs , owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 14:50:06 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 2252 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs,python X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2252-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B2252.124136173418797 (code B ref 2252); Sun, 03 May 2009 14:50:06 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2252) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 3 May 2009 14:42:14 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n43EgBMj018788 for <2252@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sun, 3 May 2009 07:42:12 -0700 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2AD4857E246; Sun, 3 May 2009 10:42:17 -0400 (EDT) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 10:52:01 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:27649 Archived-At: > I've ran inferior Python from both 23.0.90 and today's (2009-02-03) > CVS version. Python-load-file (C-c C-l) does not seem to do anything > in either. It seems to work for me, using the following recipe: touch foo.py emacs -Q foo.py C-c C-l RET C-x b *Python* RET >>> foo.__name__ 'foo' >>> Do you see something different?