From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7231: 23.3; Don't rebuild buffer list in iswitchb-visit-buffer Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:19:33 +0200 Message-ID: <87sk01w7a2.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <87r5foy90j.fsf@telefonica.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1287567775 29669 80.91.229.12 (20 Oct 2010 09:42:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:42:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7231@debbugs.gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 20 11:42:52 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8VC6-00079R-10 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:42:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35939 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8VC5-0007ve-Co for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 05:42:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52959 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8VBt-0007u8-Cy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 05:42:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8VBs-0007NU-AY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 05:42:37 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59483) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8VBs-0007NP-7d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 05:42:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8UmB-0001k9-Ne; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 05:16:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:16:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7231 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7231-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7231.12875661626698 (code B ref 7231); Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:16:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7231) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2010 09:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8Um9-0001jw-Pa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 05:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from impaqm5.telefonica.net ([213.4.138.5]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8Um6-0001jp-Dw for 7231@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 05:15:59 -0400 Original-Received: from IMPmailhost1.adm.correo ([10.20.102.38]) by IMPaqm5.telefonica.net with bizsmtp id Lt4f1f01W0piX6q3RxKaBp; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:19:34 +0200 Original-Received: from qcore ([83.52.52.115]) by IMPmailhost1.adm.correo with BIZ IMP id LxKZ1f00N2V89Bn1hxKZfx; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:19:34 +0200 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-TE-authinfo: authemail="981711563$telefonica.net" |auth_email="981711563@telefonica.net" X-TE-AcuTerraCos: auth_cuTerraCos="cosuitnetc01" In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:53:49 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 05:16:03 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41006 Archived-At: Leo writes: > If the proposed solution to iswitchb is acceptable, a similar one should > be done for ido. > > Here is a patch to be applied on top of > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=6943. > > From 5686c7c723d9bad601d870aff54b7a3d8edce471 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:17:53 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] Don't rebuild buffer list in ido-kill-buffer-at-head Can you post a version that does not require to previosly introduce another patch, so we can test *this* proposed solution instead of something else? [snip]