From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2035: 23.0.60; doc string of dired-read-shell-command Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:56:00 -0400 Message-ID: <87sjqcb41r.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <001a01c97e9c$55a8e5e0$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <2B5C612264944E4CA33A3A4A6EA74D2D@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310439462 19572 80.91.229.12 (12 Jul 2011 02:57:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 02:57:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 2035@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 12 04:57:38 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgTAH-0005hS-JX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 04:57:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39456 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgTAG-0008B9-Rm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:57:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37379) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgT9p-00088Y-5U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:57:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgT9j-0008C3-By for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:57:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33542) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgT9j-0008Bv-0U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgT9h-0007Jp-RE; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:57:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 02:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 2035 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: unreproducible Original-Received: via spool by 2035-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B2035.131043937028058 (code B ref 2035); Tue, 12 Jul 2011 02:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2035) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2011 02:56:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgT8r-0007IV-Oc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:56:09 -0400 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-06.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.147]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgT8p-0007IH-RP for 2035@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:56:08 -0400 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036225145.central.yale.edu [128.36.225.145]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-06.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6C2u1UQ018817 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:56:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:45:03 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.147 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:57:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:48686 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > "Drew Adams" writes: > >>> This has apparently already been fixed. >> >> No, it has not. The doc string has been changed, but the bug report still >> applies. Please read it. What about the prefix argument? This is not a >> command. How can it have a prefix argument? Etc. > > It is passed `current-prefix-arg' in the use cases, so I think that's > clear enough. I fixed the remaining doc issues; closing.