From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10904: 24.0.93; Infinite loop in GnuTLS code during Gnus nnimap-initiated SSL handshake Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:02:54 -0400 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87sjgah3wx.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87haxk3dce.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87hax6wakn.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87sjgdoi43.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8762d7kdk6.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334145855 11854 80.91.229.3 (11 Apr 2012 12:04:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:04:15 +0000 (UTC) To: 10904@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 11 14:04:14 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SHwHV-0001yz-0G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:04:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39199 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHwHU-00054y-Bk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:04:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46054) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHwHQ-00054s-1L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:04:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHwHE-0005BX-6W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:04:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54004) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHwHE-0005BN-3A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:03:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHwII-0007OT-CK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10904 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.133414588128394 (code B ref -1); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Apr 2012 12:04:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50542 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHwHw-0007Nu-KG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:04:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47236) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SHwHp-0007NY-CG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:04:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHwGe-00059h-BV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:03:26 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:34822) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHwGe-00059d-7u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:03:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48073) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHwGY-000527-1j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:03:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHwGP-00056K-8Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:03:13 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:52071) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHwGP-000567-1h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 08:03:05 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SHwGN-0001AM-N9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:03:03 +0200 Original-Received: from c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net ([76.28.40.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:03:03 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:03:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-76-28-40-19.hsd1.vt.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130004 (Ma Gnus v0.4) Emacs/24.0.95 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:uPNUC8cV79d+sTQjq5m84XESUuE= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:58781 Archived-At: On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:44:03 +0200 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: LMI> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> I plan to follow Nikos' advice here: >> >> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/6017 >> >> so we'll drop from NORMAL to PERFORMANCE, basically, if the user >> approves. After the 24.1 release I'll look at this. LMI> Warning the user is fine, but I don't think the user needs to be LMI> queried. OK. Ted