From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jambunathan K Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11095: [PATCH] Re: bug#11095: 24.0.94; hi-lock-face-buffer/unhighlight-regexp': Augment? Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:16:56 +0530 Message-ID: <87sj7iii4f.fsf@gmail.com> References: <81d37z271c.fsf@gmail.com> <87626i2i4r.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk1r3h3b.fsf@gmail.com> <87lidaan4g.fsf@gmail.com> <87a9tq6cs5.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1354855494 10418 80.91.229.3 (7 Dec 2012 04:44:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 04:44:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11095@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 07 05:45:06 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tgpo6-0006LF-9H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 05:45:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34073 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tgpnu-0007Jy-9D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 23:44:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58447) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tgpnr-0007Jg-FU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 23:44:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tgpnq-00061D-8Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 23:44:47 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47367) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tgpnq-000619-4h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 23:44:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tgpo6-0004CB-Dm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 23:45:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jambunathan K Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 04:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11095 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 11095-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11095.135485546516067 (code B ref 11095); Fri, 07 Dec 2012 04:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11095) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2012 04:44:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57618 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TgpnU-0004B5-QQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 23:44:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com ([209.85.160.44]:40539) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TgpnR-0004Au-T8 for 11095@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 23:44:23 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id uo1so87519pbc.3 for <11095@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 20:44:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=HTlMwGBdN2AM+tuUGKPYmqc1l6GTRnzyCsp0sFxvnmA=; b=LyqywUeIkCpC+B3l5uo/5/TKiaNo/VyLHVEkZ7JX/ZgOXGG7fU3K/Lr8XIxI25V9jd grD4/G/GvYssHjcSulu0tAoGkL+boUVB4lq0vIvJ3zfHe4AUZ/xWnxfHEuZ8LxB4p96w fIeYYNSU617McvHGw65NZnKYLYSWlJntygpnnNyPJpLrpp89blFit1pzij7w8eEn/l/I AmGEd85vYVa5RHhKI3pOzzlEe/mek3KM3ib7nSZSz5MYKiGTWSh/wto00aabLjKbk7jD bmCgX9vXQ/I6FXOKS+O+LQPNw25gzRai901HZ+WsmVnxwBxow4kXul+GZXGDih6qLT0g Xclw== Original-Received: by 10.68.233.201 with SMTP id ty9mr12514477pbc.14.1354855442534; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 20:44:02 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from debian-6.05 ([115.242.172.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id uk9sm5970329pbc.63.2012.12.06.20.43.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 06 Dec 2012 20:44:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 06 Dec 2012 23:07:39 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:68084 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >>>>> Seems to be working now (haven't tried before my recent changes, tho). >>>> By now, if you mean 111134, the unhighlighting is not working as >>>> expected. >>> Can you give a recipe, because "it works for me", >> How about a screenshot? > > That can work as well, tho since it's not a display problem, > explanations work at least as well, usually better. > I never use hi-lock, so don't assume I know how it's expected to > behave. This is the behaviour I am expecting. This is what I circulated in etc/NEWS entry. *** Unhighlighting command (`hi-lock-unface-buffer') now un-highlights text at point. When called interactively with C-u, removes all highlighting in current buffer. We seem to be talking too much but not taking a moment to understand to each other. I will exchange no more mails with you in this thread, sorry. You reply, but with no effort on your part to understand what I am saying or showing you. I am happy with whatever you conceive to be useful. > >> Recipe-1: >> Couple of C-x w h, followed by C-x w r. Note the cursor position >> and the choice offered. > > I don't see anything wrong with the cursor position. Please explain. > >> See screenshot. Why is there no default offered > > Don't know, should there be one? > >> and why even absurd candidates are offered? > > Which absurd candidates are you talking about? > >> Recipe-2: >> Turn off font-lock-mode. >> Couple of C-x w h and then try C-x w r, C-u C-x w r, try from menu. > > What am I supposed to see when I try that? > > > Stefan > > > > --