From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8429: 24.0.50; regression: `flush-lines' does not flush all it should Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 01:54:31 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87sj5e460g.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <31A5E2DEB9B24F82A8AD85713507FE10@us.oracle.com> <87k3qr5zdr.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1359850812 3474 80.91.229.3 (3 Feb 2013 00:20:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 00:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8429@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 03 01:20:32 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U1nJs-0003of-EI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 01:20:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58716 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1nJZ-0002Sn-RL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:20:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57642) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1nJX-0002QA-Gr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:20:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1nJW-0002Rn-Ed for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:20:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56106) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1nJW-0002Q6-Ba for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:20:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U1nKP-0003jq-MB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:21:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 00:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8429 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8429-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8429.135985084314342 (code B ref 8429); Sun, 03 Feb 2013 00:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8429) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Feb 2013 00:20:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33337 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U1nK7-0003jG-59 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:20:43 -0500 Original-Received: from ps18281.dreamhost.com ([69.163.218.105]:51799 helo=ps18281.dreamhostps.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U1nK5-0003j9-1z for 8429@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:20:42 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E78E258B9296F; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 16:19:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 1 Feb 2013 18:16:39 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:70620 Archived-At: > I followed the recipe in the bug report. At first I thought it was fixed, but > then I saw that there were still plenty of occurrences of the regexp matches > farther down in the buffer. When the grep process is not yet finished then of course flush-lines can't remove all matches. A running grep process adds more occurrences that you have to remove with flush-lines when grep finishes. > Try it and see what you find. I tried and see that the bug is fixed, there are no remaining occurrences when flush-lines is called after grep is finished. If you still see the bug, please send the lines containing the unremoved matches. Do they contain escape sequences?