From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16144: 24.3.50; [PATCH] eww: Don't hide windows with browsing bookmark list. Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:27:19 +0100 Message-ID: <87sitizp2g.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <87zjo3cy8c.fsf@dhcp-193-97.nrt.redhat.com> <87zjnqzq7s.fsf@building.gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387870457 15171 80.91.229.3 (24 Dec 2013 07:34:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 07:34:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16144@debbugs.gnu.org To: Kenjiro NAKAYAMA Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 24 08:34:22 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VvMVO-0000xP-Nk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:34:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36893 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvMVO-0007C5-At for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 02:34:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55736) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvMVF-00076b-Fu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 02:34:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvMV9-00081E-BN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 02:34:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51737) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvMV9-00081A-7q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 02:34:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvMV8-0000LG-Dd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 02:34:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 07:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16144 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 16144-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16144.13878704181266 (code B ref 16144); Tue, 24 Dec 2013 07:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16144) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Dec 2013 07:33:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37520 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvMUk-0000KL-1e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 02:33:38 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:59929) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvMUd-0000K5-AK for 16144@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 02:33:35 -0500 Original-Received: from 77.18.245.69.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.18.245.69] helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VvMUL-0007OI-Tm; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:33:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87zjnqzq7s.fsf@building.gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:02:31 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1VvMUL-0007OI-Tm MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1388475195.65221@JC4l9x0amVSpG+BI3ebzsg X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:82492 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I don't think it makes sense for the pop-up-a-new-buffer functions to > necessarily restore the original window layout after the buffer goes > away, anyway. Or perhaps it should. I've now made it just save the window configuration and restore it. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/