From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16220: url-http.el: Not conforming to HTTP spec Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:50:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87sitiy9fw.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387871834 27968 80.91.229.3 (24 Dec 2013 07:57:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 07:57:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16220@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jaros=C5=82aw_?= =?UTF-8?Q?Rzesz=C3=B3tko?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 24 08:57:20 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VvMrf-0005SA-AG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:57:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36956 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvMrf-0004Af-0G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 02:57:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59124) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvMrW-0004Aa-Ll for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 02:57:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvMrQ-00053j-H7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 02:57:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51782) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvMrQ-00053f-DB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 02:57:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvMrN-00029Y-Jx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 02:57:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 07:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16220 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16220-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16220.13878717848219 (code B ref 16220); Tue, 24 Dec 2013 07:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16220) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Dec 2013 07:56:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37568 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvMql-00028T-5z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 02:56:23 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:55020) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VvMqh-00028J-SA for 16220@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 02:56:20 -0500 Original-Received: from 77.18.245.69.tmi.telenormobil.no ([77.18.245.69] helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VvMqT-0007q2-Jz; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 08:56:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: ("=?UTF-8?Q?Jaros=C5=82aw_?= =?UTF-8?Q?Rzesz=C3=B3tko?="'s message of "Sun, 22 Dec 2013 22:55:07 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1VvMqT-0007q2-Jz MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1388476566.49806@paVH6ksFsgT6HDPBdSADdw X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:82496 Archived-At: Jaros=C5=82aw Rzesz=C3=B3tko writes: > I believe that the person who originally introduced the additional > newline most likely was confused by some issue in mediawiki.el itself, > a broken HTTP server, a broken PHP script, or something of this kind, > and obscured the real bug instead of fixing it: Well, that's possible. If there's a significant number of these broken HTTP servers, then including the workaround is the correct thing to do. I don't know whether that's the case, though. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/