From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10296: 24.0.92; check_glyph_memory still aborting Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 00:12:48 +0100 Message-ID: <87si2qqg0f.fsf@gnus.org> References: <4EE8548C.9030901@gmx.at> <8339cm2frk.fsf@gnu.org> <20111216095654.138360@gmx.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451085262 16432 80.91.229.3 (25 Dec 2015 23:14:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 23:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10296@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Martin Rudalics" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 26 00:14:10 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aCbYn-0001uj-0m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 00:14:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36783 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCbYm-0007z1-94 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 18:14:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45058) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCbYj-0007xe-0E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 18:14:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCbYf-00017V-R8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 18:14:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56638) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCbYf-00017R-Ns for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 18:14:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCbYf-00059V-KK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 18:14:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 23:14:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10296 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 10296-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10296.145108519219700 (code B ref 10296); Fri, 25 Dec 2015 23:14:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10296) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Dec 2015 23:13:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35998 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCbXs-00057g-68 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 18:13:12 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:32961) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCbXq-00057Y-Dh for 10296@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 18:13:11 -0500 Original-Received: from 2.150.58.24.tmi.telenormobil.no ([2.150.58.24] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aCbXV-0006Sc-2a; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 00:12:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20111216095654.138360@gmx.net> (Martin Rudalics's message of "Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:56:54 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aCbXV-0006Sc-2a MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1451689969.26268@MgExgu8nG+DYa9V2WXB8/A X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:110502 Archived-At: "Martin Rudalics" writes: >> This is not the same bug. > > As you noticed I _was_ reluctant to reopen the old bug ;-) > >> If you type "C-]" to exit the debugger, and then "C-x C-c", then Emacs >> exits normally without aborting. > > Yes. I had tried that when looking for a simpler recipe. > >> If this is by design, I could easily avoid this abort when >> command_loop_level is non-zero, if that's TRT to do. > > IMHO the fact that the abort dialogue pops up is not TRT. It's unclear what the status of this bug report is... It's marked as "moreinfo", but I don't see what info if being requested... Anyway, is this still an issue? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no