From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17173: 24.4.50; Emacs partially loses display, and redisplay via `C-l' does not fix it Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 15:09:49 +0100 Message-ID: <87si2pz4gi.fsf@gnus.org> References: <17026dc9-ee25-4e83-a5c4-86140d37e250@default>> <83lhvnbrbk.fsf@gnu.org>> <849e9e65-3cc7-45b9-b388-da5993600278@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451139081 12392 80.91.229.3 (26 Dec 2015 14:11:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 14:11:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17173@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 26 15:11:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aCpYs-0003Gz-EU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 15:11:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38763 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCpYr-0004zE-IZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 09:11:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47962) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCpYn-0004yw-7E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 09:11:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCpYj-0005Bi-VS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 09:11:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57855) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aCpYj-0005Bd-RR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 09:11:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCpYj-0005HX-OE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 09:11:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 14:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17173 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 17173-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17173.145113901320244 (code B ref 17173); Sat, 26 Dec 2015 14:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17173) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Dec 2015 14:10:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37224 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCpXx-0005GS-9N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 09:10:13 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:40478) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aCpXv-0005GK-Hj for 17173@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 09:10:11 -0500 Original-Received: from 2.150.58.24.tmi.telenormobil.no ([2.150.58.24] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aCpXa-0008A8-4e; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 15:09:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: <849e9e65-3cc7-45b9-b388-da5993600278@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Wed, 2 Apr 2014 10:19:20 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aCpXa-0008A8-4e MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1451743790.72842@OwO/JenuKgcVHcidxMuZXw X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:110640 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: >> Can you try to figure out what distinguishes the cases when it happens >> from those when it doesn't? Maybe some mouse gesture before the click >> on the obscured frame? Or maybe it depends on which optional display >> features (like display-time) you have enabled at the time? > > I will try to pay attention. I don't think that my actions in Emacs > beforehand are necessarily related - I have seen this happen also when > returning to an Emacs frame after using another Windows app (window mgr > window). Are you still seeing this problem? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no