From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uwe Brauer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22470: 25.1.50; vc-annotate (HG) does not display changes within one day (colors) Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 19:18:47 +0000 Message-ID: <87si1k5eug.fsf@mat.ucm.es> References: <87wpqwick6.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Reply-To: Uwe Brauer NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1453835963 21591 80.91.229.3 (26 Jan 2016 19:19:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 19:19:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Uwe Brauer , 22470@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 26 20:19:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aO98y-0000tO-C5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 20:19:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46300 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aO98x-00053a-Bu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:19:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42896) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aO98r-000534-AJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:19:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aO98n-0007Wy-Sr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:19:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49702) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aO98n-0007Wi-OW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:19:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aO98n-0006g3-Hq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:19:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87wpqwick6.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Resent-From: Uwe Brauer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 19:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22470 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22470-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22470.145383594025661 (code B ref 22470); Tue, 26 Jan 2016 19:19:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22470) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2016 19:19:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37922 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aO98m-0006fo-Kz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:19:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52]:34449) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aO98l-0006fc-Cr for 22470@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:18:59 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id u188so120001349wmu.1 for <22470@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 11:18:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mat.ucm.es; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:reply-to:date:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=ekwFs82ooWRd9xTRueVW7v1zDhdiPznPzagP3Pf7718=; b=kcypRNPsYx4ROY4Q38sfGJu/2YM5uQIl4kkpPEwvIDjn0ACZGadM0JPKHUTxRtPrWa DyLFZaA1/n9XfrQHDgFXgDXKlxc4AKdSU431jIe/noBHcwrGN8b/Lnzhy9r4/PXZSfam a/mJKjbKCh68Y03gsRjlKNhxg/nwXvaUTjD/o= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:reply-to:date :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=ekwFs82ooWRd9xTRueVW7v1zDhdiPznPzagP3Pf7718=; b=The6UgB7tmcMnI887JAeKvpq2GsPxQro6y6+r2zfp8w3MBWQhwmJLFmX/LHuKTDANf C/eKfl9bDJ4Og0NGrYhySKM2xRjjNp7hEYGKNVIU7LvSGyhP3lPiIUwN6v6a+EDV7ZXY oVaPGkjW6slzfqFHAc87TvVFnGjmfh5pqSo9+3G0nqjGE0MSau0saO9jt1eq2BwL3BW/ mh8SK/UoyT24aaPFRrKqbbZ+2UXL3oYsgOAfMj6nP7KSY+c6yHnpJMJ55YJd6jlVcgis wN7ZXiBHXMpgbx8ZaeON5uFHlnwwC3eWqzwbQrmLzjJw6XOn7rzHmC85hUMmP3bH7Zfh jLmw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOT9vICyNK7pKNJk809T44qSAzheYZIZjtdhoP4V9z2yHEsHsX5N88Rr3CGwF8ZvAj1s X-Received: by 10.28.48.194 with SMTP id w185mr27470684wmw.73.1453835933657; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 11:18:53 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Gilgamesch (gilgamesch.quim.ucm.es. [147.96.12.99]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x189sm14020804wmg.1.2016.01.26.11.18.52 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Jan 2016 11:18:52 -0800 (PST) X-Mailer: emacs 25.1.50.1 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) X-Hashcash: 1:20:160126:rgm@gnu.org::1ZM2jQ9DkgMwPOtE:0000000cG6 X-Hashcash: 1:20:160126:22470@debbugs.gnu.org::3MAatMzkOwpGcyWK:00000000000000000000000000000000000000001oKl X-Hashcash: 1:20:160126:oub@mat.ucm.es::OZpx/doTsMHxfiqQ:0002THp User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:112011 Archived-At: >>> "GM" == Glenn Morris writes: > Uwe Brauer wrote: >> For master vc-annotate displays the lines all in the same color while >> emacs-25-branch distinguish them. > FWIW, I see no difference between current master and emacs-25. > It also seems self-evident to me that if you've set the date to only > display at the level of days, you'll only get colouring at the same > level. Well I hoped one could generate coloring which reflects changes within the day, but display the time format deleting the hours and minutes but it seems not to be possible. > The current vc-annotate behavior for hg seems consistent with eg git. Well but I still think it were better to display changes which occur within a day. > Finally, at a very quick glance that ahg thing seems to colorize > based on revision number, not on age, which is a different scheme. By revision number do you mean the changeset or the internal local revision number which hg assigns to its commits but git does not? If it is the former, maybe that would be a more appropriate model for vc-annotate? > So personally I see no bug here. I did not use the word bug, I was asked to send a bug report in order to find out whether there is a bug.