From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10346: 24.0.92; doc string of `save-buffer' Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:58:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87shy6lzb8.fsf@gnus.org> References: <34F77D4702114FF094072B135F951820@us.oracle.com> <87iosoalvy.fsf@building.gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461844838 30345 80.91.229.3 (28 Apr 2016 12:00:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:00:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10346@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 28 14:00:22 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1avkcH-0002iA-99 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 14:00:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48180 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avkcG-0002cR-Rv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 08:00:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38884) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avkc7-0002O8-RH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 08:00:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avkby-0005HW-Lp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 08:00:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39084) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avkby-0005HQ-Ip for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 08:00:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avkby-0003TV-D0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 08:00:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10346 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10346-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10346.146184474413256 (code B ref 10346); Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10346) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Apr 2016 11:59:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51418 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avkay-0003RG-V2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:59:04 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:36682) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avkau-0003R3-I1 for 10346@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:59:00 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avkap-0002Ve-QB; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 13:58:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87iosoalvy.fsf@building.gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 08 Feb 2014 21:35:45 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:117042 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >> The doc string talks about the prefix arg, but no connection is made to >> ARGS for use in Lisp. > > Yes. But the values for ARG are so... non-Lispey, I have a feeling > that it's been left off by choice. The values are basically 0, 4, 16 > and 64, which are ... kinda opaque when calling a function like that. > > I don't know. Should these values be documented or not? I think they're left out on purpose. Closing. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no