From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11890: 24.1; (wrong-type-argument processp nil) in `shell-mode' Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 18:13:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87shy590fl.fsf@gnus.org> References: <07B28F5ABD0546EC8A39BD037E08FB76@us.oracle.com> <87fuu5afz4.fsf@gnus.org> <42210bb6-aac5-4853-8813-51e689996892@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461860068 4655 80.91.229.3 (28 Apr 2016 16:14:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:14:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Schwab , 11890@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 28 18:14:16 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1avoZy-0008Md-Q7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 18:14:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50001 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avoZv-0007eZ-0h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:14:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56379) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avoZq-0007a2-GW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:14:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avoZm-0004xr-E3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:14:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41026) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avoZm-0004xm-Ag for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avoZm-0008Ou-72 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11890 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11890-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11890.146185998832210 (code B ref 11890); Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11890) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Apr 2016 16:13:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53360 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avoYu-0008NQ-GZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:13:08 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:60160) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avoYs-0008NJ-Vk for 11890@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 12:13:07 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avoYo-0004jY-Qi; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 18:13:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <42210bb6-aac5-4853-8813-51e689996892@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Thu, 28 Apr 2016 09:10:14 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:117086 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: >> Do you have a recipe from -Q? From the backtrace included, it kinda >> looked like the bug was triggered from your own code. > > No, and it should not matter. The command should not just barf with > a wrong-type error msg. > > As the bug report says: > > Clearly, this code in shell.el is not tolerant of there being no process: > > (file-name-nondirectory > (car (process-command (get-buffer-process (current-buffer))))) > > I imagine that it should be, or rather that it should perhaps raise an > error with a more suitable message. There are many functions that may fail if called with invalid parameters or in invalid buffers. Emacs does not attempt to cover them all with user-level error messages. If you don't have a recipe here, I don't see what how to proceed further, and I'm closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no