From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23431: 25.0.93; EWW hangs Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 19:04:21 +0200 Message-ID: <87shxz3wfe.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87bn4nx1iq.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <87zis75ibn.fsf@gnus.org> <87d1p35e2g.fsf@gnus.org> <8360uvkt9y.fsf@gnu.org> <874maf5cqb.fsf@gnus.org> <8337pzksce.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462295212 810 80.91.229.3 (3 May 2016 17:06:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 17:06:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23431@debbugs.gnu.org, jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 03 19:06:37 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1axdlT-00034n-Ok for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 19:05:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42327 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axdlK-0002Dq-Td for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 13:05:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34670) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axdl8-0001wB-1r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 13:05:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axdkv-0006H3-Ab for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 13:05:12 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51481) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axdkv-0006FR-7u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 13:05:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axdkr-00013n-Lx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 13:05:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 17:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23431 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23431-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23431.14622950694028 (code B ref 23431); Tue, 03 May 2016 17:05:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23431) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2016 17:04:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35585 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axdkL-00012u-8T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 13:04:29 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:33903) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axdkI-00012l-Q4 for 23431@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 13:04:27 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axdkD-0000tn-9z; Tue, 03 May 2016 19:04:25 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8337pzksce.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 03 May 2016 19:40:33 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:117657 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > So you are saying that a single call to image-animate-timeout takes > much longer than the value of 'delay'? Well, `image-animate-timeout' doesn't really do much, but if the next timeout arrives much later than `delay' specified, then we can surmise that displaying the next image in the sequence took a lot of time. Most parts of the image formatting doesn't happen until redisplay happens -- `image-animate-timeout' just increases the image index, and then redisplay does all the hard lifting. While redisplay is doing all that, Emacs isn't allowing any events to fire, I think, so we should be able to see that Emacs is busy... > (Which is what typically, btw?) I think for most GIFs it's typically 0.1s, but it can be larger. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no