From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24738: 26.0.50; Incorrect Edebug spec for seq-let Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:03:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87shrr5twp.fsf@petton.fr> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1476950871 29731 195.159.176.226 (20 Oct 2016 08:07:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 08:07:51 +0000 (UTC) To: Gemini Lasswell , 24738@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 20 10:07:47 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bx8Nx-0005XS-Hv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:07:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53076 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bx8Nz-0004H3-Ow for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 04:07:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57434) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bx8Kd-0001OF-Gl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 04:04:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bx8KY-0000GG-LO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 04:04:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34119) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bx8KY-0000GC-Ho for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 04:04:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bx8KY-0001mP-2l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 04:04:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Nicolas Petton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 08:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24738 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24738-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24738.14769506236818 (code B ref 24738); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 08:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24738) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2016 08:03:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40309 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bx8KF-0001ls-Bx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 04:03:43 -0400 Original-Received: from 60.102.92.92.rev.sfr.net ([92.92.102.60]:59466 helo=blueberry.localdomain) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bx8KD-0001lf-7a for 24738@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 04:03:42 -0400 Original-Received: by blueberry.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EC1E41A5063; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:03:34 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:124717 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Gemini Lasswell writes: Hi Gemini, > The Edebug spec for seq-let is incorrect, causing code that uses it to > not work correctly while instrumented for debugging. > > To reproduce: > > 1. emacs -Q > 2. enter the following code into *scratch*: > > (defun seq-let-bug () > (let ((nums [1 2 3 4 5])) > (seq-let (a b c) nums > (message "a=%s b=%s c=%s" a b c)))) > > 3. C-u C-M-x > 4. M-: (seq-let-bug) RET > > Result: a=nil b=nil c=nil > Expected result: a=1 b=2 c=3 Indeed, thanks for reporting! > > Changing seq-let's edebug spec to (debug (sexp form body)) > fixes this for me. Why sexp instead of form for the first argument? Cheers, Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYCHpWAAoJECM1h6R8IHkQsIMH/2HrcrFFRFojtDZbEBYy0XJQ vgZwtByILjajieBIeCHVmkELXdOWGVkkG7MYvfA0/DFkQTeq1E7cJUYJK8eT6uhy mIOUa7qHh0Z+8pmMJ1Goi3cAgBqNdQKCIsN3UOxlY/B9YhGpLPhtW5UAVrueekQn 5HlTzEL6cVTNr/BpCf/l7DWzVvZAKm07/6SVbOzbgLT8okDpQE/BF4xnreuQWHmZ cTgeX1Hu7wtkEqjmfmP2YHt/DaPFVFcq8AzVpCVQwKR2TbM4KV7IXaYfcN1Xe2j6 4Vz07pMxi8SMtb2a1q5CIxiFRJJf6ciU6kkoXzqR37yu6fh+Oc+ObukH1XnEpN8= =VmbE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--