Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > A thing just occurred to me: Does the map-* functions work for plists, > too? plists are, like, the fourth major mapping structure we have in > Lisp. Not currently. > Wouldn't it be easy to extend map-* to handle plists, too? For > instance, map-delete (of course) knows whether it's looking at a hash > table or an array, but it can also easily distinguish between an alist > and a plist by just looking at the first element, can't it? Yes, it would, and was proposed a few weeks ago. > It's a bit hacky, though. But might be nice. It would. I didn't do it initially exactly because I thought it was a bit hackish, but I agree that it would be nice to have. Cheers, Nico