unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "João Távora" <joaotavora@gmail.com>
To: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
Cc: Beatrix Klebe <beeuhtricks@gmail.com>,
	bea@klebe.blog, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>,
	33794@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#33794: 26.1; electric-pair-mode breaks auto-newline minor mode of cc-mode
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 22:55:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sgypmasb.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181222221540.GC3935@ACM> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Sat, 22 Dec 2018 22:15:40 +0000")

Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:

> Right now, João's direction of travel seems to be to cement
> electric-pair-mode's unusability in modes like CC Mode, of which there
> are quite a few.  I hope I've misunderstood this and I'm mistaken.

You are.  In fact, I'm coming up with alternatives so that
electric-pair-mode works with CC-Mode, even if the user or some other
mode customizes it to not use c-electric-{brace,paren}.

You may say that I am not working actively to make e-p-m work with
c-toggle-auto-newline, which *in my opinion* is a part of CC-mode that
could and should someday be fulfilled by electric-layout-mode.  That is
100% true.  But I am not preventing anyone from taking on that task, or
even suggesting it's trivial or very hard.  I just don't know, and I
have no interest in studying this alternative.

That is quite different from "cementing an unusability".Have a look at
my recent commits in scratch/fix-33794-extend-electric-layout-mode and
you will see that I have done 0 changes to e-p-m.

Also, can you once and for all describe the "unusabilities" in other
modes you keep talking about???

>> Yes, Alan disagrees with this.  In his view, electric- modes are abusing
>> the semantics of post-self-insert-hook.  Well, at least in my view of
>> his views :-)
>
> Please don't misrepresent me like that.

Really, I didn't.  But OK, I will think thrice before writing "Alan
thinks" sentences.

> The point is that the electric-... modes abuse not so much the
> post-self-insert-hook (although they do),

So, in reality I didn't misrepresent you.

> but they totally break self-insert-command.  You have had several
> hours to contest this, but by your silence appear to have accepted it.

How can I contest or accept that which I have no opinion of?  I'm not an
expert in the teleology of self-insert-command!  Find someone who is to
discuss this!

Frankly: "my silence"...  I'm not taking that bait, OK?  Really, Alan,
please please understand that I am only trying to make
electric-layout-mode work a bit better, and not even touching any of its
basic functioning vis-a-vis self-insert-command.

João








  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-22 22:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-18 17:38 bug#33794: 26.1; electric-pair-mode breaks auto-newline minor mode of cc-mode Beatrix Klebe
     [not found] ` <mailman.5894.1545155289.1284.bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2018-12-21 13:48   ` Alan Mackenzie
2018-12-21 13:57     ` João Távora
2018-12-21 14:12       ` Stefan Monnier
2018-12-21 16:00         ` Beatrix Klebe
2018-12-21 18:49           ` João Távora
2018-12-21 19:06             ` Beatrix Klebe
2018-12-21 19:20               ` João Távora
2018-12-21 19:24                 ` João Távora
2018-12-21 19:43                 ` Beatrix Klebe
2018-12-22  1:08                   ` João Távora
2018-12-22  2:16                     ` João Távora
2018-12-22  2:41                       ` Alan Mackenzie
2018-12-22  3:22                         ` João Távora
2018-12-22  4:41                           ` Beatrix Klebe
2018-12-22 10:02                             ` João Távora
2018-12-22 12:33                           ` Alan Mackenzie
2019-01-01 19:27           ` Alan Mackenzie
2019-01-15 16:10             ` Alan Mackenzie
2018-12-21 20:11         ` Alan Mackenzie
2018-12-22  0:45           ` João Távora
2018-12-22 10:20             ` Alan Mackenzie
2018-12-22 13:47               ` João Távora
2018-12-21 21:50       ` Alan Mackenzie
2018-12-22 16:22         ` Stefan Monnier
2018-12-22 16:34           ` Beatrix Klebe
2018-12-22 17:12             ` Stefan Monnier
2018-12-22 17:34               ` Beatrix Klebe
2018-12-22 21:19                 ` João Távora
2018-12-22 22:15                   ` Alan Mackenzie
2018-12-22 22:55                     ` João Távora [this message]
2018-12-23 20:21                       ` Alan Mackenzie
     [not found]                       ` <20181223202143.GA6658@ACM>
2018-12-23 21:38                         ` João Távora
2018-12-23 21:46                           ` Alan Mackenzie
2018-12-28 12:44                           ` Alan Mackenzie
2018-12-23 14:43                     ` Stefan Monnier
2018-12-23 14:48   ` Alan Mackenzie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87sgypmasb.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=joaotavora@gmail.com \
    --cc=33794@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=acm@muc.de \
    --cc=bea@klebe.blog \
    --cc=beeuhtricks@gmail.com \
    --cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).