From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 23:53:23 +0200 Message-ID: <87sgooroa4.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="226525"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" To: 37485@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 22 23:54:09 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iC9o1-000wq6-Mt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 23:54:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50988 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iC9o0-0008AW-LZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 17:54:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36122) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iC9nv-0008AQ-Ax for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 17:54:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iC9nu-0001cl-AA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 17:54:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54011) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iC9nu-0001cf-6Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 17:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iC9nu-0007kk-1x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 17:54:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 21:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 37485 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.156918921129753 (code B ref -1); Sun, 22 Sep 2019 21:54:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Sep 2019 21:53:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34599 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iC9nP-0007jp-2i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 17:53:31 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:45866) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iC9nN-0007jg-Ue for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 17:53:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36045) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iC9nM-00088c-Ke for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 17:53:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iC9nL-0001T3-IN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 17:53:28 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:41680) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iC9nL-0001Sr-BR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 17:53:27 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iC9nH-0002st-Tc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 23:53:26 +0200 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:166947 Archived-At: It's long annoyed med that `C-m' is described thusly by describe-bindings: C-c RET Prefix Command C-c RET C-c mml-secure-message-encrypt C-c RET C-e mml-secure-message-sign-encrypt C-c RET C-n mml-unsecure-message C-c RET C-p Prefix Command C-c RET C-s mml-secure-message-sign C-c RET C Prefix Command C-c RET P mml-preview C-c RET S Prefix Command C-c RET b mml-attach-buffer C-c RET c Prefix Command I know that `C-m' and RET is the same key binding, but I also think that when this key is used as a prefix key, I don't think anybody has ever wanted that to be RET instead of `C-m'. Or is there a way to distinguish what we mean, somehow? In GNU Emacs 27.0.50 (build 17, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.5) of 2019-09-21 built on marnie Repository revision: c61bfe0a3adab1a9fd0dc283cbf8291a78ed6da1 Repository branch: master Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11902000 System Description: Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no