From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37556: gpg "-unknown" version string Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 14:09:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87sgoc8y67.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87sgoel53e.fsf@gnus.org> <837e5qdzim.fsf@gnu.org> <85imp9kgj1.fsf@gmail.com> <875zl9dewa.fsf@gnus.org> <85ftkdkfjv.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="231595"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , 37556@debbugs.gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 01 14:10:43 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iFGzK-000y2u-V8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 14:10:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41228 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iFGzD-0003yr-UV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 08:10:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40255) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iFGyk-0003iX-4j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 08:10:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iFGyh-0006Sn-WF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 08:10:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52149) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iFGyg-0006Qz-2C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 08:10:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFGyf-0003SB-Ol for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 08:10:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 12:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37556 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 37556-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37556.156993178413248 (code B ref 37556); Tue, 01 Oct 2019 12:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37556) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Oct 2019 12:09:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60970 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFGyO-0003Rc-5L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 08:09:44 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:49144) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFGyM-0003RU-92 for 37556@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 08:09:42 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iFGyH-0002Hh-CZ; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 14:09:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: <85ftkdkfjv.fsf@gmail.com> (Noam Postavsky's message of "Mon, 30 Sep 2019 10:46:28 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:167977 Archived-At: Noam Postavsky writes: > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > >>> I don't understand why making -unknown equivalent to a lesser version >>> makes sense. Shouldn't 2.2.17 and 2.2.17-unknown in fact be equal? >> >> Should they? 2.2.17-pre and 2.2.17-alpha should be less than 2.2.17, >> but how do we know that -unknown isn't something -alpha-ish? > > It's "unknown", so it could be something opposite-of-alpha-ish too, > right? On average, 0 seems right. That's possible. Does anybody know how usual these -unknown things are, and why they exist? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no