From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37321: 27.0.50; Excessive gc in a use case (el-search) Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 10:43:06 +0200 Message-ID: <87sgo3typ1.fsf@web.de> References: <87lfv1pm5x.fsf@web.de> <874l1mc01w.fsf@web.de> <87woeidd4g.fsf@web.de> <733d0142-51ee-55df-de0c-cca7c989b370@cs.ucla.edu> <875zlgu2y8.fsf@web.de> <6d670180-e2ee-030f-ef0e-ad0c5c7a8ef5@cs.ucla.edu> <87tv8zs2r9.fsf@web.de> <83tv8zl0es.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="105770"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, 37321@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 08 10:44:44 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHl6q-000RQv-AP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 10:44:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52192 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHl6n-00031B-T6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 04:44:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57541) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHl6B-000310-LL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 04:44:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHl6A-0003EO-La for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 04:44:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40641) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHl6A-0003E8-Hq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 04:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHl6A-0001au-Cq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 04:44:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 08:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37321-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37321.15705242146074 (code B ref 37321); Tue, 08 Oct 2019 08:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37321) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2019 08:43:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49462 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHl5h-0001Zt-7h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 04:43:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:51269) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHl5d-0001ZX-PW for 37321@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 04:43:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1570524182; bh=nzuTVxg/ezDr2v9jITVnYXSHyRmncoAICFi8TBJDpEI=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=QkJWII6eKBY5kVllUgJTlhc1BqUytuya5u3dk7FZEm2uDQzSltT/A3gSRe9wDIs93 9VTglVxbvMi9S0zrprg5AEwEgg9KAqrHqtWINGRxapVXGfySXh3MnKKA/6dmL0mg99 ThVyTmHCIlOBylcatDMKtusDthq01BgscvNS1+QA= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([94.218.185.16]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb103 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LzKEH-1i4xMd1eYT-014Wfm; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 10:43:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83tv8zl0es.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:14:35 +0300") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:95XrtTsJWbBpAr6cahkft+HPZ/QHz0gZEhesVQRwaTBy5hbBE5a 3zDp/T2+mASs3wCTLcIYJPaw6PWJh66eZD5ShW3dLx1F5etgunatmhtYa9iONN3rr2uXTcz kYOZGnElIi3EmColp+m1vBN4FEZ97WGSGzkpvGcVBVt64kc9s2wtIWLG5u1DZPfXTrWqPia UqloxtpQIFPD8ZOVp8Tlg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:cPRI69lZMQw=:ekxB2TRzRqSXsmBuBQPvWx UN79X9iZQ7tBUZ3aFfyevEFOaZOaKhg7s1SP/iCuy+XmY4KZWAlANLaaYit4ysDP0S92oj1f1 SK7BSRjVCY10VsxnVDjws/a0983Ea/XqxJ1Zz9TbVoJdwfSOrP6aCA8/tvVgJHqX772rWCFqG EPp58fRZpUcLlzm1UzUJNtFb067sKBZJtQXsLC+9alJGb0sk9Syv2u5JP6jYGljCYrTZhvjcj wyGNUqBQ4R0DBhxGr/SJ5jQDI2hNPqOl1e0CpONYZRrg+g3jD8/fjtOqcORB9AST36S4t/SSl V1t1jZ8v1bYPpzn+ffMG/BVMFBubV9N/pEc2oQaU4RzcAnZPnGY0eeoHnzbZlUqtUzX9PuxGI Pc7G6qUl1DQNZnFvCjE8qksOxMniFr9TtLB++orx473vC11GTS4gkQsoGioLOMlTM4aZHt4XK Kzt3/MTZFQq4k+wGz0LZEhXI9RKkeQBrGJDbBGJw5UYX9ZzuqNtfbVc9WtAKfMPmyFW024z1X wcDPnG8TW8AfQZXavUvKkKGk1lEG1A6YQLHCfRX0cE5BkXvlrDxy8omCFD2ZBgLqDsetkvJsm h/gCsL5MsKpki3llLR0UeA5CukeKnXYC56Z4XN4phClUO6LYr8z8OgwiewBAh/0DNIIhgjlI9 OXb5bq0fB8jTz14uh3i6iZ9gc7HCC08sjatQYSTdSgNfFJCCTyw6JkEOlE238ZxVpYgsjg1qQ J60u3F9FJltlwGXKBsq9PKorLbH4z2WFIhH+AxoSvkaGWxGN6+NDNem8kJyef5nDRw/jRO9q X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:168609 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > > From: Michael Heerdegen > > Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 13:42:02 +0200 > > Cc: 37321@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > > That is, if you are observing significantly better performance with > > > gc-cons-percentage set to 0.8, shouldn't we set it to be that value = by > > > default in Emacs? > > > > Good question. Could it have downsides (I guess garbage collection > > would happen less often but take longer then so one could get noticeab= le > > interrupts)? > > Using 0.8 means we won't GC before we cons 80% of the heap, which > sounds too high. I've now had it set to 0.8 in my init file all the time and Emacs behaved ok afaict. So, do you want to try to increase some gc value in Emacs master now? Regards, Michael.